• Stars
    star
    321
  • Rank 130,752 (Top 3 %)
  • Language
    TypeScript
  • License
    MIT License
  • Created about 5 years ago
  • Updated almost 2 years ago

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Be the first to send feedback to the community and the maintainers!

Repository Details

Publish CI

This library addresses the pain of writing and maintaining code for business objects in Typescript

The goal is to increase, in order of importance

  • Correctness
  • Productivity
  • Developer Experience

It is has two side blended into one; generic ADT manipulation AND Generic, customizable and extensible derivations

Two minutes intro

Add the batteries package to your repo

yarn add '@morphic-ts/batteries'

Then summon your first Morph

import { summonFor } from '@morphic-ts/batteries/lib/summoner-BASTJ'

const { summon } = summonFor<{}>({}) // Necessary to Specify the config environment (see Config Environment)

export const Person = summon(F =>
  F.interface(
    {
      name: F.string(),
      age: F.number()
    },
    'Person'
  )
)

You now have access to everything to develop around this Type

Person.build // basic build function (enforcing correct type)
Person.show // Show from fp-ts
Person.type // io-ts
Person.strictType // io-ts
Person.eq // Eq from fp-ts
Person.lensFromPath // and other optics (optionals, prism, ) from monocle-ts
Person.arb // fast-check
Person.jsonSchema // JsonSchema-ish representation

Note that batteries exposes several summoners:

BASTJ, ESBAST, ESBASTJ, ESBST These naming are derived from the exposed derivations:

  • E(Eq)
  • B(Build)
  • A(Arbitraries from fast-check)
  • S(Show)
  • ST((Strict) ioTs codecs)
  • J(JsonSchema)

Typically, ESBST is best for runtime with lower memory footprint (no fastcheck) and maybe the right default

You can create yours in userland, it's quite easy if you check how it's done in the batteries package

Discriminated, taggedUnion-like models

import { summonFor } from '@morphic-ts/batteries/lib/summoner-ESBASTJ'

const { summon, tagged } = summonFor<{}>({})

export const Bicycle = summon(F =>
  F.interface(
    {
      type: F.stringLiteral('Bicycle'),
      color: F.string()
    },
    'Bicycle'
  )
)

export const Car = summon(F =>
  F.interface(
    {
      type: F.stringLiteral('Car'),
      kind: F.keysOf({ electric: null, fuel: null, gaz: null }),
      power: F.number()
    },
    'Car'
  )
)

const Vehicle = tagged('type')({ Car, Bicycle })

Now you have access to previously depicted derivation + ADT support (ctors, predicates, optics, matchers,reducers, etc.. see ADT Manipulation below)

Use tag if your input model does not have a discriminant

in case your existing model do not expose a discriminant, you can use tag to enrich at decode time your model; that enrichment won't be serialized on encoding.

For instance for Car, the solution would be:

export const Car = summon(F =>
  F.interface(
    {
      type: F.tag('Car'),
      kind: F.keysOf({ electric: null, fuel: null, gaz: null }),
      power: F.number()
    },
    'Car'
  )
)

Which would accept an input with shape

{
  "kind": "electric",
  "power": 90
}

Beware that using this with taggedUnion (or tagged construct) is very inefficient on decoding (trying to decode all Morphs one after the other until it finds a matching one)

Want opaque nominal (instead of structural) inferred types

You may use this pattern

import type { AType, EType } from '@morphic-ts/summoners'

const Car_ = summon(F =>
  F.interface(
    {
      type: F.stringLiteral('Car'),
      kind: F.keysOf({ electric: null, fuel: null, gaz: null }),
      power: F.number()
    },
    'Car'
  )
)
export interface Car extends AType<typeof Car_> {}
export interface CarRaw extends EType<typeof Car_> {}
export const Car = AsOpaque<CarRaw, Car>(Car_)

We're sorry for the boilerplate, this is a current Typescript limitation but in our experience, this is worth the effort. A snippet is available to help with that in this repo .vscode folder; we recommend using it extensively.

Configurable

As nice as a General DSL solution to specify your Schema is, there's still some specifics you would like to use.

Morphic gives you the ability to change any derivation via an optional config.

For example, we may want to specify how fastcheck should generate some strings:

summon(F => F.array(F.string({ FastCheckURI: arb => arb.filter(s => s.length > 2) })))

Note: this is type guided and type safe, it's not an any in disguise

You may provide several Configurations (by indexing by several URI)

Config Environment

Configs are used to override some specific interpreter instances and this is of great value.

But there's a pitfall.

If one wants to use the fastcheck version of a Morph, for testing reasons, but do not want to have fastcheck included in its app, he needs to reinterpret a Morph:

Using derive:

const Person = summonESBST(F =>
  F.interface(
    {
      name: F.string,
      birthDate: F.date
    },
    'Person'
  )
)
const PersonARB = Person.derive(modelFastCheckInterpreter)({})

He can also reinterpret using another summoner.

const AnotherPerson = summonESBASTJ(Person) // Reinterpreter using another summoner (thus generating different type classes)

However, it is often desirable to override fastcheck via a config, for instance, to generate realistic arbitration (here the name with alphabetic letters and a min/max length or a birth date in the past).

Doing so means that one needs to add a config for fastcheck when defining the Person members Morphs, thus, including the fastcheck lib.

But doing so, the lib is imported outside of tests, which is not desirable.

Config Environment solve this issue by offering the ability to give access to an environment for the config of each interpreter.

The motivation is providing ways to abstract over dependencies used in configs.

We can access an environnement to use in a config like so (here IoTsTypes):

summon(F =>
  F.interface({ a: F.string({ IoTsURI: (x, env: IoTsTypes) => env.WM.withMessage(x, () => 'not ok') }) }, 'a')
)

The environnement type has to be specified at definition site.

To prevent really importing the lib to get it's type (the definition is purely a type), we can rely on type imports from typescript.

import type * as fc from 'fast-check'

The Config also infers the correct Env type and only typechecks correctly if summon has been instantiated with correct Env constraints using the summonFor constructor.

Creating the summon requires providing (all) the environments a summoner will be able to support.

export const { summon } = summonFor<{ IoTsURI: IoTsTypes }>({ IoTsURI: { WM } })

I advise you to use a proxy interface to keep this opaque an lean.

export interface AppEnv {
  IoTsURI: IoTsTypes
}

export const { summon } = summonFor<AppEnv>({ IoTsURI: { WM } })

If the underlying Interpreter of summoner does not generate a type-class (e.g. io-ts), then there is no need to feed it at creation time:

export const { summon } = summonFor<{ IoTsURI: IoTsTypes }>({})

This will type-check accordingly.

However the type constraint of the Env will remain in the summoner signature, so that any (re)interpretation from another summoner will thread that constraint; there no compromise on type safety.

The consequence is that any interpreting summoner Env will need to cover all the Env from the source summoner.

This transitive aspect is the necessary condition for correct (re)interpretations.

Define

Summoners now also provide a define member in order to help creating Programs (not Morphs).

Those define are only constrained by the summoner Algebra (Program), not the summoner TypeClasses. And as such, these can freely be combined with any kind of summoner implementing this Algebra.

They also carry their Config Env constraints.

You can directly create a Define instance by using defineFor and specifying the algebra (via a program Uri).

defineFor(ProgramNoUnionURI)(F => F.string)

How it works

When you specify a Schema, you're using an API (eDSL implemented using final tagless). This API defines a Program (your schema) using an Algebra (the combinators exposed to do so).

This Algebra you're using is actually composed of several Algebras merged together, some defines how to encode a boolean, some others a strMap (string Map), etc..

Then for each possible derivation there's possibly an Ìnterpreter` implementing some Algebras. What Morphic does is orchestrating this machinery for you

This pattern has some interesting properties; it is extensible in both the Algebra and the Interpreter

Generic Derivation

Specify the structure of your Schema only once and automatically has access various supported implementations

Participate into expanding implementation and/or schema capabilities

Example of implementations:

  • Structural equality (via Eq from fp-ts)
  • Validators (io-ts)
  • Schema generation (JsonSchema flavor)
  • Pretty print of data structure (Show from fp-ts)
  • Generators (FastCheck)
  • ...
  • TypeOrm (WIP)

This is not an exhaustive list, because the design of Morphic enables to define more and more Interpreters for your Schemas (composed of Algebras).

ADT Manipulation

Note: ADT behaviour is available via Summoners; however it is also available without the derivation machinery, hence this paragraph, which also applies to summoned Morphs.

ADT stands for Algebraic Data Types, this may be strange, just think about it as the pattern to represent your casual Business objects

ADT manipulation support maybe be used without relying on full Morphic objects.

The feature can be used standalone via the makeADT function with support for:

  • Smart Ctors
  • Predicates
  • Optics (Arcane name for libraries helping manipulate immutable data structures in FP)
  • Matchers
  • Reducers
  • Creation of new ADTs via selection, exclusion, intersection or union of existing ADTs

Ad-hoc usage via makeADT (Morphic's summon already does that for you):

Let's define some Types

interface Bicycle {
  type: 'Bicycle'
  color: string
}

interface Motorbike {
  type: 'Motorbike'
  seats: number
}

interface Car {
  type: 'Car'
  kind: 'electric' | 'fuel' | 'gaz'
  power: number
  seats: number
}

Then build an ADT from them for PROFIT!

// ADT<Car | Motorbike | Bicycle, "type">
const Vehicle = makeADT('type')({
  Car: ofType<Car>(),
  Motorbike: ofType<Motorbike>(),
  Bicycle: ofType<Bicycle>()
})

Then you have..

Constructors

Vehicle.of.Bicycle({ color: 'red' }) // type is Car | Motorbike | Bicycle

// `as` offer a narrowed type
Vehicle.as.Car({ kind: 'electric', power: 2, seats: 4 }) // type is Car

Predicates

// Predicate and Refinements
Vehicle.is.Bicycle // (a: Car | Motorbike | Bicycle) => a is Bicycle

// Exist also for several Types
const isTrafficJamProof = Vehicle.isAnyOf(['Motorbike', 'Bicycle']) // (a: Car | Motorbike | Bicycle) => a is Motorbike | Bicycle

Matchers

const nbSeats = Vehicle.match({
  Car: ({ seats }) => seats,
  Motorbike: ({ seats }) => seats,
  Bicycle: _ => 1
})

// Alternatively you may use `default`
Vehicle.match(
  {
    Car: ({ seats }) => seats,
    Motorbike: ({ seats }) => seats
  },
  _ => 1
)

// match widens the returned type by contructing a union of all branches result types
// Here it is number | 'none'
Vehicle.match(
  {
    Car: ({ seats }) => seats,
    Motorbike: ({ seats }) => seats
  },
  _ => 'none' as const
)

// A stricter variant enforcing homogeneous return type in branches exists
Vehicle.matchStrict({
  Car: ({ seats }) => seats,
  Motorbike: ({ seats }) => seats,
  Bicycle: _ => 1
})

// Which would error in case of heterogeneous return types, like this:
Vehicle.matchStrict({
  Car: ({ seats }) => seats,
  Motorbike: ({ seats }) => seats,
  Bicycle: _ => 'none'
})

Transformers

// You may transform matching a subset
Vehicle.transform({
  Car: car => ({ ...car, seats: car.seats + 1 })
})

Reducers

// Creating a reducer is made as easy as specifying a type
Vehicle.createReducer({ totalSeats: 0 })({
  Car: ({ seats }) => ({ totalSeats }) => ({ totalSeats: totalSeats + seats }),
  Motorbike: ({ seats }) => ({ totalSeats }) => ({ totalSeats: totalSeats + seats }),
  default: _ => identity
})
// Partial reducers are also supported
Vehicle.createPartialReducer({ totalSeats: 0 })({
  Car: ({ seats }) => ({ totalSeats }) => ({ totalSeats: totalSeats + seats }),
  Motorbike: ({ seats }) => ({ totalSeats }) => ({ totalSeats: totalSeats + seats })
})

Selection, Exclusion, Intersection and Union of ADTs

This will help getting unique advantage of Typescript ability to refine Unions

const Motorized = Vehicle.select(['Car', 'Motorbike']) // ADT<Car | Motorbike, "type">

const TrafficJamProof = Vehicle.exclude(['Car']) // ADT<Motorbike | Bicycle, "type">

const Faster = intersectADT(Motorized, TrafficJamProof) // ADT<Motorbike, "type">

const ManyChoice = unionADT(Motorized, TrafficJamProof) // ADT<Car  | Motorbike | Bicycle, "type">

Optics (via Monocle)

We support lenses, optional, prism pre-typed helpers

Lens example:

const motorizedSeatLens = Motorized.lensFromProp('seats') // Lens<Car | Motorbike, number>

const incSeat = motorizedSeatLens.modify(increment) // (s: Car | Motorbike) => Car | Motorbike

const vehicleSeatOptional = Vehicle.matchOptional<number>({
  Motorbike: motorizedSeatLens.asOptional(),
  Car: motorizedSeatLens.asOptional()
  // undesired cases can be omitted
}) // Optional<Vehicle, number>

Get in touch

The best place to reach out is https://fpchat-invite.herokuapp.com (channel #morphic)