cargo-semver-checks
Lint your crate API changes for semver violations.
Quick Start
$ cargo install cargo-semver-checks --locked
# Check whether it's safe to release the new version:
$ cargo semver-checks check-release
Or use as a GitHub Action (used in .github/workflows/ci.yml in this repo):
- name: Check semver
uses: obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks-action@v2
Each failing check references specific items in the Cargo SemVer reference or other reference pages, as appropriate. It also includes the item name and file location that are the cause of the problem, as well as a link to the implementation of that query in the current version of the tool.
FAQ
cargo-semver-checks
support?
What Rust versions does cargo-semver-checks
uses the rustdoc tool to analyze the crate's API.
Rustdoc's JSON output format isn't stable, and can have breaking changes in new Rust versions.
When each cargo-semver-checks
version is released, it will at minimum include support
for the then-current stable and beta Rust versions. It may, but is not guaranteed to,
additionally support some nightly Rust versions.
The GitHub Action uses
the most recent versions of both cargo-semver-checks
and stable Rust,
so it should be unaffected. Users using cargo-semver-checks
in other ways
are encouraged to update cargo-semver-checks
when updating Rust versions
to ensure continued compatibility.
Does the crate I'm checking have to be published on crates.io?
No, it does not have to be published anywhere. You'll just need to use a flag to help
cargo-semver-checks
locate the version to use as a baseline for semver-checking.
By default, cargo-semver-checks
uses crates.io to look up the previous version of the crate,
which is used as the baseline for semver-checking the current version of the crate.
The following flags can be used to explicitly specify a baseline instead:
--baseline-version <X.Y.Z>
Version from registry to lookup for a baseline
--baseline-rev <REV>
Git revision to lookup for a baseline
--baseline-root <MANIFEST_ROOT>
Directory containing baseline crate source
--baseline-rustdoc <JSON_PATH>
The rustdoc json file to use as a semver baseline
Custom registries are not currently supported (#160), so crates published on registries other than crates.io should use one of the other approaches of generating the baseline.
cargo-semver-checks
have false positives?
Does "False positive" means that cargo-semver-checks
reported a semver violation incorrectly.
A design goal of cargo-semver-checks
is to not have false positives.
If they do occur, they are considered bugs.
When cargo-semver-checks
reports a semver violation, it should always point to a specific
file and approximate line number where the specified issue occurs; failure to specify
a file and line number is also considered a bug.
If you think cargo-semver-checks
might have a false-positive but you aren't sure, please
open an issue.
Semver in Rust has many non-obvious and tricky edge cases,
especially in the presence of macros.
We'd be happy to look into it together with you to determine if it's a false positive or not.
cargo-semver-checks
catch every semver violation?
Will No, it will not β not yet!
There are many ways to break semver, and cargo-semver-checks
doesn't yet have lints for all of them.
New lints are added frequently, and
we'd be happy to mentor you
if you'd like to contribute new lints!
Append --verbose
when semver-checking your crate to see the full list of performed semver checks.
Here are some example areas where cargo-semver-checks
currently will not catch semver violations:
- breaking type changes, for example in the type of a field or function parameter
- breaking changes in generics or lifetimes
- breaking changes that exist when only a subset of all crate features are activated
cargo-semver-checks
instead of ...?
Why rust semverver builds on top of rustc internals to build rlib's and compare their metadata. This strips the code down to the basics for identifying changes. However, is tightly coupled to specific nightly compiler versions and takes work to stay in sync.
cargo breaking effectively runs
cargo expand
and re-parses the code using
syn
which requires re-implementing large
swaths of rust's semantics to then lint the API for changes.
This is limited to the feature and target the crate was compiled for.
cargo-semver-checks
sources its data from rustdoc's json output. While the
json output format is unstable, the rate of change is fairly low, reducing the
churn in keeping up. The lints are also written as queries for trustfall
"query everything" engine, reducing
the work for creating and maintaining them. Because of the extra data that
rustdoc includes, some level of feature/target awareness might be able to be
introduced.
There is interest in
hosting rustdoc JSON on docs.rs
meaning
that semver-checking could one day download the baseline rustdoc JSON file instead of generating it.
Also, generally speaking, inspecting JSON data is likely going to be faster than full compilation.
cargo-public-api
uses rustdoc,
like cargo-semver-checks
, but focuses more on API diffing (showing which
items has changed) and not API linting (explaining why they have changed and
providing control over what counts).
Why is scanning massive crates slow?
Crates that are ~100,000+ lines of Rust may currently experience scan times of a several minutes due to some missing optimizations.
For implementation convenience, there's some O(n^2)
scaling for n
items in a few places.
If your crate is negatively affected by this,
please let us know
so we can best prioritize optimization versus feature work.
cargo-semver-check
and cargo-semver-checks
?
Why is it sometimes This crate was intended to be published under the name cargo-semver-check
, and may indeed one
day be published under that name. Due to
an unfortunate mishap,
it remains cargo-semver-checks
for the time being.
The cargo_semver_check
name is reserved on crates.io but all its versions
are intentionally yanked. Please use the cargo-semver-checks
crate instead.
License
Available under the Apache License (Version 2.0) or the MIT license, at your option.
Copyright 2022-present Predrag Gruevski and Project Contributors. The present date is determined by the timestamp of the most recent commit in the repository. Project Contributors are all authors and committers of commits in the repository.