• Stars
    star
    129
  • Rank 279,262 (Top 6 %)
  • Language
    Python
  • License
    Other
  • Created almost 3 years ago
  • Updated almost 2 years ago

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Be the first to send feedback to the community and the maintainers!

Repository Details

The Implementation of "Auto-Lambda: Disentangling Dynamic Task Relationships" [TMLR 2022].

Auto-Lambda

This repository contains the source code of Auto-Lambda and baselines from the paper, Auto-Lambda: Disentangling Dynamic Task Relationships.

We encourage readers to check out our project page, including more interesting discussions and insights which are not covered in our technical paper.

Multi-task Methods

We implemented all weighting and gradient-based baselines presented in the paper for computer vision tasks: Dense Prediction Tasks (for NYUv2 and CityScapes) and Multi-domain Classification Tasks (for CIFAR-100).

Specifically, we have covered the implementation of these following multi-task optimisation methods:

Weighting-based:

Gradient-based:

Note: Applying a combination of both weighting and gradient-based methods can further improve performance.

Datasets

We applied the same data pre-processing following our previous project: MTAN which experimented on:

  • NYUv2 [3 Tasks] - 13 Class Segmentation + Depth Estimation + Surface Normal. [288 x 384] Resolution.
  • CityScapes [3 Tasks] - 19 Class Segmentation + 10 Class Part Segmentation + Disparity (Inverse Depth) Estimation. [256 x 512] Resolution.

Note: We have included a new task: Part Segmentation for CityScapes dataset. Please install the pip install panoptic_parts for CityScapes experiments. The pre-processing file for CityScapes has also been included in the dataset folder.

Experiments

All experiments were written in PyTorch 1.7 and can be trained with different flags (hyper-parameters) when running each training script. We briefly introduce some important flags below.

Flag Name Usage Comments
network choose multi-task network: split, mtan both architectures are based on ResNet-50; only available in dense prediction tasks
dataset choose dataset: nyuv2, cityscapes only available in dense prediction tasks
weight choose weighting-based method: equal, uncert, dwa, autol only autol will behave differently when set to different primary tasks
grad_method choose gradient-based method: graddrop, pcgrad, cagrad weight and grad_method can be applied together
task choose primary tasks: seg, depth, normal for NYUv2, seg, part_seg, disp for CityScapes, all: a combination of all standard 3 tasks only available in dense prediction tasks
with_noise toggle on to add noise prediction task for training (to evaluate robustness in auxiliary learning setting) only available in dense prediction tasks
subset_id choose domain ID for CIFAR-100, choose -1 for the multi-task learning setting only available in CIFAR-100 tasks
autol_init initialisation of Auto-Lambda, default 0.1 only available when applying Auto-Lambda
autol_lr learning rate of Auto-Lambda, default 1e-4 for NYUv2 and 3e-5 for CityScapes only available when applying Auto-Lambda

Training Auto-Lambda in Multi-task / Auxiliary Learning Mode:

python trainer_dense.py --dataset [nyuv2, cityscapes] --task [PRIMARY_TASK] --weight autol --gpu 0   # for NYUv2 or CityScapes dataset
python trainer_cifar.py --subset_id [PRIMARY_DOMAIN_ID] --weight autol --gpu 0   # for CIFAR-100 dataset

Training in Single-task Learning Mode:

python trainer_dense_single.py --dataset [nyuv2, cityscapes] --task [PRIMARY_TASK]  --gpu 0   # for NYUv2 or CityScapes dataset
python trainer_cifar_single.py --subset_id [PRIMARY_DOMAIN_ID] --gpu 0   # for CIFAR-100 dataset

Note: All experiments in the original paper were trained from scratch without pre-training.

Benchmark

For standard 3 tasks in NYUv2 (without noise prediction task) in the multi-task learning setting with Split architecture, please follow the results below.

Method Type Sem. Seg. (mIOU) Depth (aErr.) Normal (mDist.) Delta MTL
Single - 43.37 52.24 22.40 -
Equal W 44.64 43.32 24.48 +3.57%
DWA W 45.14 43.06 24.17 +4.58%
GradDrop G 45.39 43.23 24.18 +4.65%
PCGrad G 45.15 42.38 24.13 +5.09%
Uncertainty W 45.98 41.26 24.09 +6.50%
CAGrad G 46.14 41.91 23.52 +7.05%
Auto-Lambda W 47.17 40.97 23.68 +8.21%
Auto-Lambda + CAGrad W + G 48.26 39.82 22.81 +11.07%

Note: The results were averaged across three random seeds. You should expect the error range less than +/-1%.

Citation

If you found this code/work to be useful in your own research, please considering citing the following:

@article{liu2022auto_lambda,
    title={Auto-Lambda: Disentangling Dynamic Task Relationships},
    author={Liu, Shikun and James, Stephen and Davison, Andrew J and Johns, Edward},
    journal={Transactions on Machine Learning Research},
    year={2022}
}

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank @Cranial-XIX for his clean implementation for gradient-based optimisation methods.

Contact

If you have any questions, please contact [email protected].