wds
A reloading dev server for server side TypeScript projects. Compiles TypeScript real fast, on demand, using require.extensions
. Similar to and inspired by ts-node-dev
.
wds stands for Whirlwind (or web) Development Server.
Examples
After installing wds
, you can use it like you might use the node
command line program:
# run one script with wds compiling TS to JS
wds some-script.ts
# run one server with wds `watch` mode, re-running the server on any file changes
wds --watch some-server.ts
# run one script with node command line arguments that you'd normally pass to `node`
wds --inspect some-test.test.ts
Features
- Builds and runs TypeScript really fast using
swc
- Incrementally rebuilds only what has changed in
--watch
mode, restarting the process on file changes - Execute commands on demand with the
--commands
mode - Plays nice with node.js command line flags like
--inspect
or--prof
- Supports node.js
ipc
channels between the process startingwds
and the node.js process started bywds
. - Produces sourcemaps which Just Work
โข๏ธ by default for debugging with many editors (VSCode, IntelliJ, etc) - Monorepo aware, allowing for different configuration per package and only compiling what is actually required from the monorepo context
Motivation
You deserve to get stuff done. You deserve a fast iteration loop. If you're writing TypeScript for node, you still deserve to have a fast iteration loop, but with big codebases, tsc
can get quite slow. Instead, you can use a fast TS => JS transpiler like swc
to quickly reload your runtime code and get to the point where you know if your code is working as fast as possible. This means a small sacrifice: tsc
no longer typechecks your code as you run it, and so you must supplement with typechecking in your editor or in CI.
This tool prioritizes rebooting a node.js TypeScript project as fast as possible. This means it doesn't typecheck. Type checking gets prohibitively slow at scale, so we recommend using this separate typechecker approach that still gives you valuable feedback out of band. That way, you don't have to wait for it to see if your change actually worked. We usually don't run anything other than VSCode's TypeScript integration locally, and then run a full tsc --noEmit
in CI.
Usage
Options:
--help Show help [boolean]
--version Show version number [boolean]
-c, --commands Trigger commands by watching for them on stdin. Prevents
stdin from being forwarded to the process. Only command right
now is `rs` to restart the server. [boolean] [default: false]
-w, --watch Trigger restarts by watching for changes to required files
[boolean] [default: false]
-s, --supervise Supervise and restart the process when it exits indefinitely
[boolean] [default: false]
Configuration
Configuration for wds
is done by adding a wds.js
file to your pacakge root, and optionally a .swcrc
file if using swc
as your compiler backend.
An wds.js
file needs to export an object like so:
module.exports = {
// which file extensions to build, defaults to .js, .jsx, .ts, .tsx extensions
extensions: [".tsx", ".ts", ".mdx"],
// file paths to explicitly not transform for speed, defaults to [], plus whatever the compiler backend excludes by default, which is `node_modules` for swc
ignore: ["spec/integration/**/node_modules", "spec/**/*.spec.ts", "cypress/", "public/"],
};
swc
(the default)
When using swc
is the fastest TypeScript compiler we've found and is the default compiler wds
uses. wds
sets up a default swc
config suitable for compiling to JS for running in Node:
{
"env": {
"targets": {
"node": 16
}
},
"jsc": {
"parser": {
"syntax": "typescript",
"decorators": true,
"dynamicImport": true
},
"target": "es2020"
},
"module": {
"type": "commonjs",
// turn on lazy imports for maximum reboot performance
"lazy": true
}
}
Note: the above config is different than the default swc config. It's been honed to give maximum performance for server start time, but can be adjusted by creating your own .swcrc
file.
Configuring swc
's compiler options with with wds
can be done using the wds.js
file. Create a file named wds.js
in the root of your repository with content like this:
// wds.js
module.exports = {
swc: {
env: {
targets: {
node: 12,
},
},
},
};
You can also use swc
's built in configuration mechanism which is an .swcrc
file. Using an .swcrc
file is useful in order to share swc
configuration between wds
and other tools that might use swc
under the hood as well, like @swc/jest
. To stop using wds
's default config and use the config from a .swcrc
file, you must configure wds to do so using wds.js
like so:
// in wds.js
module.exports = {
swc: ".swcrc",
};
And then, you can use swc
's standard syntax for the .swcrc
file
// in .swcrc, these are the defaults wds uses
{
"env": {
"targets": {
"node": 16
}
},
"jsc": {
"parser": {
"syntax": "typescript",
"decorators": true,
"dynamicImport": true
},
"target": "es2020"
},
"module": {
"type": "commonjs",
// turn on lazy imports for maximum reboot performance
"lazy": true
}
}
Refer to the SWC docs for more info.
ts-node-dev
Comparison to ts-node-dev
(and ts-node
) accomplish a similar feat but are often 5-10x slower than wds
in big projects. They are loaded with features and will keep up with new TypeScript features much better as they use the mainline TypeScript compiler sources, and we think they make lots of sense! Because they use TypeScript proper for compilation though, even with --transpile-only
, they are destined to be slower than swc
. wds
is for the times where you care a lot more about performance and are ok with the tradeoffs swc
makes, like not supporting const enum
and being a touch behind on supporting new TypeScript releases.