• Stars
    star
    1
  • Language
    R
  • Created about 5 years ago
  • Updated about 5 years ago

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Be the first to send feedback to the community and the maintainers!

Repository Details

This repository contains codes and materials used in the PIMseq paper.

More Repositories

1

RCM

A model-based visualization method for microbiome data
R
16
star
2

SPsimSeq

Semi-parametric simulation of bulk and single cell RNA-seq data
R
10
star
3

xnet

xnet: a package for supervised network prediction
R
10
star
4

pim

R package for probabilistic index models
R
9
star
5

digipcr

digital PCR processing tools in R
R
2
star
6

unifiedWMWqPCR

Bioconductor package of unified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for qPCR
R
2
star
7

reconsi

Resample collapsed null distributions for simultaneous inference under dependence
R
2
star
8

Additional-File-6

Additional File 6
2
star
9

PIMseq

repository for the package PIMseq
R
2
star
10

NTCPmodels

Package implementing NTCP models
R
1
star
11

dPowerCalcR

Power calculations for digital PCR
R
1
star
12

smooth2

Additional Material for the book Smooth Tests of Goodness of Fit Using R
HTML
1
star
13

combi

Explorative integration of genomics data through multiplots
R
1
star
14

UCNR

Simulation code, case studies and tutorials for the Unified Censored Normal Regression model for qPCR analysis.
R
1
star
15

EBayesH

The R package EBayesH
R
1
star
16

mountainr

Bringing R and alpine to Docker
1
star
17

AppDGE

Shiny application to evaluate the performance of several differential gene expression tools for RNA-seq data.
R
1
star
18

Additional-File-2

This github repository includes R software codes used for a study on the evaluation of 14 differential gene expression methods for RNA-sequencing data (particularly for mRNA and lncRNA). The study has three main modules: (1) comparing selected normalization methods, (2) concordance analysis of 14 DGE analysis tools using 6 publicly accessible real RNA-seq data, and (3) non-parametric simulation study to evaluate tools with respect to false discovery rate and sensitivity.
1
star