• Stars
    star
    520
  • Rank 85,117 (Top 2 %)
  • Language
    Python
  • License
    MIT License
  • Created over 6 years ago
  • Updated 6 months ago

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Be the first to send feedback to the community and the maintainers!

Repository Details

Django postgresql backend that apply migrations with respect to database locks

PyPI PyPI - Python Version PyPI - Django Version Postgres Version PyPI - License

PyPI - Downloads GitHub last commit Build Status

django-pg-zero-downtime-migrations

Django postgresql backend that apply migrations with respect to database locks.

Installation

pip install django-pg-zero-downtime-migrations

Usage

To enable zero downtime migrations for postgres just setup django backend provided by this package and add most safe settings:

DATABASES = {
    'default': {
        'ENGINE': 'django_zero_downtime_migrations.backends.postgres',
        #'ENGINE': 'django_zero_downtime_migrations.backends.postgis',
        ...
    }
}
ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_LOCK_TIMEOUT = '2s'
ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_STATEMENT_TIMEOUT = '2s'
ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_FLEXIBLE_STATEMENT_TIMEOUT = True
ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_RAISE_FOR_UNSAFE = True
ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_USE_NOT_NULL = False

NOTE: this backend brings zero downtime improvements only for migrations (schema and RunSQL operations, but not for RunPython operation), for other purpose it works the same as standard django backend.

NOTE: this package is in beta, please check your migrations SQL before applying on production and submit issue for any question.

Differences with standard django backend

This backend provides same result state (except NOT NULL constraint replacement for old postgres versions if appropriate option configured), but different way and with additional guarantees for avoiding stuck table locks.

This backend doesn't use transactions for migrations (except RunPython operation), because not all SQL fixes can be run in transaction and it allows to avoid deadlocks for complex migration. So when your migration will down in middle of transaction you need fix it manually (instead potential downtime). For that reason good practice to make migration modules small as possible.

Deployment flow

There are requirements for zero downtime deployment:

  1. We have one database;
  2. We have several instances with application - application always should be available, even you restart one of instances;
  3. We have balancer before instances;
  4. Our application works fine before, on and after migration - old application works fine with old and new database schema version;
  5. Our application works fine before, on and after instance updating - old and new application versions work fine with new database schema version.

deployment timeline

Flow:

  1. apply migrations
  2. disconnect instance form balancer, restart it and back to balancer - repeat this operation one by one for all instances

If our deployment don't satisfy zero downtime deployment rules, then we split it to smaller deployments.

deployment flow

Settings

ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_LOCK_TIMEOUT

Apply lock_timeout for SQL statements that require ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock, default None:

ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_LOCK_TIMEOUT = '2s'

Allowed values:

  • None - current postgres setting used
  • other - timeout will be applied, 0 and equivalents mean that timeout will be disabled

ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_STATEMENT_TIMEOUT

Apply statement_timeout for SQL statements that require ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock, default None:

ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_STATEMENT_TIMEOUT = '2s'

Allowed values:

  • None - current postgres setting used
  • other - timeout will be applied, 0 and equivalents mean that timeout will be disabled

ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_FLEXIBLE_STATEMENT_TIMEOUT

Set statement_timeout to 0ms for SQL statements that require SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock that useful in case when statement_timeout enabled globally and you try run long-running operations like index creation or constraint validation, default False:

ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_FLEXIBLE_STATEMENT_TIMEOUT = True

ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_RAISE_FOR_UNSAFE

Enabled option doesn't allow run potential unsafe migration, default False:

ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_RAISE_FOR_UNSAFE = True

ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_USE_NOT_NULL

Set policy for avoiding NOT NULL constraint creation long lock, default None:

ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_USE_NOT_NULL = 10 ** 7

Allowed values:

  • None - standard django's behaviour (raise for ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_RAISE_FOR_UNSAFE = True)
  • True - always replace NOT NULL constraint with CHECK (field IS NOT NULL) (don't raise for ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_RAISE_FOR_UNSAFE = True)
  • False - always use NOT NULL constraint (don't raise for ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_RAISE_FOR_UNSAFE = True)
  • int value - use CHECK (field IS NOT NULL) instead NOT NULL constraint if table has more than value rows (approximate rows count used) otherwise use NOT NULL constraint (don't raise for ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_RAISE_FOR_UNSAFE = True)
  • USE_PG_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_FOR_SUPERUSER - use pg_catalog.pg_attribute update to mark column NOT NULL and provide same state as default django backend (don't raise for ZERO_DOWNTIME_MIGRATIONS_RAISE_FOR_UNSAFE = True).

NOTE: For postgres 12 and newest NOT NULL constraint creation has migration replacement that provide same state as default django backend, so this option deprecated and doesn't used this postgres version. If you use CHECK NOT NULL compatible constraint before you can migrate it to NOT NULL constraints with manage.py migrate_isnotnull_check_constraints management command (add INSTALLED_APPS += ['django_zero_downtime_migrations'] to settings.py to use management command).

How it works

Postgres table level locks

Postgres has different locks on table level that can conflict with each other https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-TABLES:

ACCESS SHARE ROW SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE SHARE SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE EXCLUSIVE ACCESS EXCLUSIVE
ACCESS SHARE X
ROW SHARE X X
ROW EXCLUSIVE X X X X
SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE X X X X X
SHARE X X X X X
SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE X X X X X X
EXCLUSIVE X X X X X X X
ACCESS EXCLUSIVE X X X X X X X X

Migration and business logic locks

Lets split this lock to migration and business logic operations.

  • Migration operations work synchronously in one thread and cover schema migrations (data migrations conflict with business logic operations same as business logic conflict concurrently).
  • Business logic operations work concurrently.

Migration locks

lock operations
ACCESS EXCLUSIVE CREATE SEQUENCE, DROP SEQUENCE, CREATE TABLE, DROP TABLE *, ALTER TABLE **, DROP INDEX
SHARE CREATE INDEX
SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY, DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY, ALTER TABLE VALIDATE CONSTRAINT ***

*: CREATE SEQUENCE, DROP SEQUENCE, CREATE TABLE, DROP TABLE shouldn't have conflicts, because your business logic shouldn't yet operate with created tables and shouldn't already operate with deleted tables.

**: Not all ALTER TABLE operations take ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock, but all current django's migrations take it https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/backends/base/schema.py, https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/backends/postgresql/schema.py and https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-altertable.html.

***: Django doesn't have VALIDATE CONSTRAINT logic, but we will use it for some cases.

Business logic locks

lock operations conflict with lock conflict with operations
ACCESS SHARE SELECT ACCESS EXCLUSIVE ALTER TABLE, DROP INDEX
ROW SHARE SELECT FOR UPDATE ACCESS EXCLUSIVE, EXCLUSIVE ALTER TABLE, DROP INDEX
ROW EXCLUSIVE INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ACCESS EXCLUSIVE, EXCLUSIVE, SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE, SHARE ALTER TABLE, DROP INDEX, CREATE INDEX

So you can find that all django schema changes for exist table conflicts with business logic, but fortunately they are safe or has safe alternative in general.

Postgres row level locks

As business logic mostly works with table rows it's also important to understand lock conflicts on row level https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-ROWS:

lock FOR KEY SHARE FOR SHARE FOR NO KEY UPDATE FOR UPDATE
FOR KEY SHARE X
FOR SHARE X X
FOR NO KEY UPDATE X X X
FOR UPDATE X X X X

Main point there is if you have two transactions that update one row, then second transaction will wait until first will be completed. So for business logic and data migrations better to avoid updates for whole table and use batch operations instead.

NOTE: batch operations also can work faster because postgres can use more optimal execution plan with indexes for small data range.

Transactions FIFO waiting

postgres FIFO

Found same diagram in interesting article http://pankrat.github.io/2015/django-migrations-without-downtimes/.

In this diagram we can extract several metrics:

  1. operation time - time spent changing schema, in the case of long running operations on many rows tables like CREATE INDEX or ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN SET DEFAULT, so you need a safe equivalent.
  2. waiting time - your migration will wait until all transactions complete, so there is issue for long running operations/transactions like analytic, so you need avoid it or disable during migration.
  3. queries per second + execution time and connections pool - if executing many queries, especially long running ones, they can consume all available database connections until the lock is released, so you need different optimizations there: run migrations when least busy, decrease query count and execution time, split data.
  4. too many operations in one transaction - you have issues in all previous points for one operation so if you have many operations in one transaction then you have more likelihood to get this issue, so you need avoid too many simultaneous operations in a single transaction (or even not run it in a transaction at all but being careful when an operation fails).

Dealing with timeouts

Postgres has two settings to dealing with waiting time and operation time presented in diagram: lock_timeout and statement_timeout.

SET lock_timeout TO '2s' allow you to avoid downtime when you have long running query/transaction before run migration (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-client.html#GUC-LOCK-TIMEOUT).

SET statement_timeout TO '2s' allow you to avoid downtime when you have long running migration query (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-client.html#GUC-STATEMENT-TIMEOUT).

Deadlocks

There no downtime issues for deadlocks, but too many operations in one transaction can take most conflicted lock and release it only after transaction commit or rollback. So it's a good idea to avoid ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock operations and long time operations in one transaction. Deadlocks also can make you migration stuck on production deployment when different tables will be locked, for example, for FOREIGN KEY that take ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock for two tables.

Rows and values storing

Postgres store values of different types different ways. If you try to convert one type to another and it stored different way then postgres will rewrite all values. Fortunately some types stored same way and postgres need to do nothing to change type, but in some cases postgres need to check that all values have same with new type limitations, for example string length.

Multiversion Concurrency Control

Regarding documentation https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/mvcc-intro.html data consistency in postgres is maintained by using a multiversion model. This means that each SQL statement sees a snapshot of data. It has advantage for adding and deleting columns without any indexes, constrains and defaults do not change exist data, new version of data will be created on INSERT and UPDATE, delete just mark you record expired. All garbage will be collected later by VACUUM or AUTO VACUUM.

Django migrations hacks

Any schema changes can be processed with creation of new table and copy data to it, but it can take significant time.

# name safe safe alternative description
1 CREATE SEQUENCE X safe operation, because your business logic shouldn't operate with new sequence on migration time *
2 DROP SEQUENCE X safe operation, because your business logic shouldn't operate with this sequence on migration time *
3 CREATE TABLE X safe operation, because your business logic shouldn't operate with new table on migration time *
4 DROP TABLE X safe operation, because your business logic shouldn't operate with this table on migration time *
5 ALTER TABLE RENAME TO add new table and copy data unsafe operation, it's too hard write business logic that operate with two tables simultaneously, so propose CREATE TABLE and then copy all data to new table *
6 ALTER TABLE SET TABLESPACE add new table and copy data unsafe operation, but probably you don't need it at all or often *
7 ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN X safe operation if without SET NOT NULL, SET DEFAULT, PRIMARY KEY, UNIQUE *
8 ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN SET DEFAULT add column and set default unsafe operation, because you spend time in migration to populate all values in table, so propose ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN and then populate column and then SET DEFAULT *
9 ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN SET NOT NULL +/- unsafe operation, because doesn't work without SET DEFAULT or after migration old code can insert rows without new column and raise exception, so propose ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN and then populate column and then ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN SET NOT NULL * and **
10 ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN PRIMARY KEY add index and add constraint unsafe operation, because you spend time in migration to CREATE INDEX, so propose ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN and then CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY and then ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT PRIMARY KEY USING INDEX ***
11 ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN UNIQUE add index and add constraint unsafe operation, because you spend time in migration to CREATE INDEX, so propose ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN and then CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY and then ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT UNIQUE USING INDEX ***
12 ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN TYPE +/- unsafe operation, because you spend time in migration to check that all items in column valid or to change type, but some operations can be safe ****
13 ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN SET NOT NULL +/- unsafe operation, because you spend time in migration to check that all items in column NOT NULL **
14 ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN DROP NOT NULL X safe operation
15 ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN SET DEFAULT X safe operation
16 ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN DROP DEFAULT X safe operation
17 ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN X safe operation, because your business logic shouldn't operate with this column on migration time, however better ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN DROP NOT NULL, ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT and DROP INDEX before * and *****
18 ALTER TABLE RENAME COLUMN add new column and copy data unsafe operation, it's too hard write business logic that operate with two columns simultaneously, so propose ALTER TABLE CREATE COLUMN and then copy all data to new column *
19 ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT CHECK add as not valid and validate unsafe operation, because you spend time in migration to check constraint
20 ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT (CHECK) X safe operation
21 ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY add as not valid and validate unsafe operation, because you spend time in migration to check constraint, lock two tables
22 ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT (FOREIGN KEY) X safe operation, lock two tables
23 ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT PRIMARY KEY add index and add constraint unsafe operation, because you spend time in migration to create index ***
24 ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT (PRIMARY KEY) X safe operation ***
25 ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT UNIQUE add index and add constraint unsafe operation, because you spend time in migration to create index ***
26 ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT (UNIQUE) X safe operation ***
27 ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT EXCLUDE add new table and copy data
28 ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT (EXCLUDE) X
29 CREATE INDEX CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY unsafe operation, because you spend time in migration to create index
30 DROP INDEX X DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY safe operation ***
31 CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY X safe operation
32 DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY X safe operation ***

*: main point with migration on production without downtime that your code should correctly work before and after migration, lets look this point closely in Dealing with logic that should work before and after migration section.

**: postgres will check that all items in column NOT NULL that take time, lets look this point closely in Dealing with NOT NULL constraint section.

***: postgres will have same behaviour when you skip ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT UNIQUE USING INDEX and still unclear difference with CONCURRENTLY except difference in locks, lets look this point closely in Dealing with UNIQUE constraint.

****: lets look this point closely in Dealing with ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN TYPE section.

*****: if you check migration on CI with python manage.py makemigrations --check you can't drop column in code without migration creation, so in this case you can be useful back migration flow: apply code on all instances and then migrate database

Dealing with logic that should work before and after migration

Adding and removing models and columns

Migrations: CREATE SEQUENCE, DROP SEQUENCE, CREATE TABLE, DROP TABLE, ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN, ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN.

This migrations are pretty safe, because your logic doesn't work with this data before migration

Changes for working logic

Migrations: ALTER TABLE RENAME TO, ALTER TABLE SET TABLESPACE, ALTER TABLE RENAME COLUMN, ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT EXCLUDE.

For this migration too hard implement logic that will work correctly for all instances, so there are two ways to dealing with it:

  1. create new table/column, copy exist data, drop old table/column
  2. downtime
Create column with default

Migrations: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN SET DEFAULT.

Standard django's behaviour for creation column with default is populate all values with default. Django don't use database defaults permanently, so when you add new column with default django will create column with default and drop this default at once, eg. new default will come from django code. In this case you can have a gap when migration applied by not all instances has updated and at this moment new rows in table will be without default and probably you need update nullable values after that. So to avoid this case best way is avoid creation column with default and split column creation (with default for new rows) and data population to two migrations (with deployments).

Dealing with NOT NULL constraint

Postgres check that all column items NOT NULL when you applying NOT NULL constraint, for postgres 12 and newest it doesn't make this check if appropriate CHECK CONSTRAINT exists, but for older versions you can't defer this check as for NOT VALID. Fortunately we have some hacks and alternatives there for old postgres versions.

  1. Run migrations when load minimal to avoid negative affect of locking.
  2. SET statement_timeout and try to set NOT NULL constraint for small tables.
  3. Use CHECK (column IS NOT NULL) constraint instead that support NOT VALID option with next VALIDATE CONSTRAINT, see article for details https://medium.com/doctolib-engineering/adding-a-not-null-constraint-on-pg-faster-with-minimal-locking-38b2c00c4d1c. There are additionally can be applied NOT NULL constraint via direct pg_catalog.pg_attribute attnotnull update, but it require superuser permissions.

Dealing with UNIQUE constraint

Postgres has two approaches for uniqueness: CREATE UNIQUE INDEX and ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT UNIQUE - both use unique index inside. Difference that we can find that we cannot apply DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY for constraint. However it still unclear what difference for DROP INDEX and DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY except difference in locks, but as we seen before both marked as safe - we don't spend time in DROP INDEX, just wait for lock. So as django use constraint for uniqueness we also have a hacks to use constraint safely.

Dealing with ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN TYPE

Next operations are safe:

  1. varchar(LESS) to varchar(MORE) where LESS < MORE
  2. varchar(ANY) to text
  3. numeric(LESS, SAME) to numeric(MORE, SAME) where LESS < MORE and SAME == SAME

For other operations propose to create new column and copy data to it. Eg. some types can be also safe, but you should check yourself.