• Stars
    star
    231
  • Rank 173,434 (Top 4 %)
  • Language
  • License
    MIT License
  • Created over 8 years ago
  • Updated about 2 years ago

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Be the first to send feedback to the community and the maintainers!

Repository Details

HPatches: Homography-patches dataset.

HPatches: Homography-patches dataset

This repository contains details about the HPatches (Homography patches) dataset.

More details can be found on the relevant CVPR 2017 publication [1].

The HPatches dataset was used as the basis for the local descriptor evaluation challenge that was presented in the Local Features: State of the Art, Open Problems and Performance Evaluation workshop during ECCV 2016.

There is a companion benchmarking toolbox which defines the tasks and implements the HPatches evaluation protocol. Note that the benchmarking code allows to automatically download all the needed dataset files with a use of an automated script, and thus is the suggested way to use the dataset for descriptor evaluation purposes.

If there is a need to manually get the HPatches dataset, download and untar the following file:

Sample code for reading the patches in python and matlab is provided in the hpatches-benchmark repository.

Dataset Description

Patches are extracted from a number of image sequences, where each sequence contains images of the same scenes. Sequences are organised in folders depending on the type of transformations between images:

  • i_X: patches extracted from image sequences with illumination changes.
  • v_X: patches extracted from image sequences with viewpoint changes.

For each image sequence, we provide a set of reference patches ref.png extracted from an image used as reference. For all other images in the sequence, we provide two more files, eX.png and hX.png, containing the "same" (corresponding) patches as found in the other images. In order to simulate the limitations of common patch detectors, correspondence are extracted by adding a certain amount of geometric noise (affine jitter). In particular, the e (easy) patches have little geometric noise and the h (hard) patches have more. Each patch has a size of 65x65 pixels and a single *.png file contains all the patches extracted from an image stacked along a single column.

Patch Extraction Method

Each image sequence contains a reference image and 5 target images taken under a different illumination and/or, for a planar scenes, a different viewpoint. For all images we have the estimated ground truth homography $H$ with respect to the reference (stored in CSV files H_ref_X where $X=1,...,5$).

Example sequence Image 1: Example image sequence. The leftmost image is the reference image, followed by 5 images with a different viewpoint.

Patches are sampled in the reference image using a combination of local feature extractors (Hessian, Harris and DoG detector). The patch orientation is estimated using a single major orientation using Lowe's method. No affine adaptation is used, therefore all patches are square regions in the reference image.

Patches are extracted from regions with a scale magnified by a factor of 5 compared to the original detected feature scale. Only patches for which this region is fully contained in the image are kept.

In order to prevent multiple detections at the same location, multiple detections with ellipse overlap greater than 50% are clustered and a single ellipse at random is kept. A subset of the detected patches with their measurement regions is shown in the following image:

Example detections

Image 2: Example detections in the reference image. Patches locations are visualized as ellipses. The scale of the detected patches (orange) is magnified by factor 5 to obtain the patch measurement region (yellow).

In order to extract the patches from a target image, first an affine jitter is applied. The goal of the affine jitter is to simulate the geometric repeatability error of typical local features detector.

For easy jitter, the median ellipse overlap with the original patches is ~0.85 and for hard jitter it is ~0.72. After jittering, the frames are reprojected to the target image using the ground truth homography.

The following images show the reprojected easy/hard patches in the target image together with the extracted patches.

Reprojected easy patches

Image 3: Visualization of the easy patches locations in the target images.

Extracted easy patches

Image 4: Extracted easy patches from the example sequence.

Reprojected hard patches

Image 5: Visualization of the hard patches locations in the target images.

Extracted hard patches

Image 6: Extracted hard patches from the example sequence.

Full image sequences

In addition to the extracted patch-based dataset, we provide the full image sequences that were used, together with the corresponding homographies.

For information about relevant citations concerning patches extracted from sequences that were not originally introduced in this dataset, please check references.txt.

Please cite the original sources if you use HPatches for your research.

References

[1] HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptors, Vassileios Balntas*, Karel Lenc*, Andrea Vedaldi and Krystian Mikolajczyk, CVPR 2017. [arXiv pdf] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.05939.pdf) *Authors contributed equally.

@InProceedings{hpatches_2017_cvpr,
author={Vassileios Balntas and Karel Lenc and Andrea Vedaldi and Krystian Mikolajczyk},
title = {HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptors},
booktitle = {CVPR},
year = {2017}}