Bevy Best Practices
An opionated set of convensions I stick to in my Bevy projects.
Up to date as of Bevy 0.11.
Table of Contents
Entities
Name and Cleanup
All entities must be spawned with a Name
and cleanup component at the front of the bundle.
Names assist with debugging. Cleanup components indicate to which state the entity belongs, and to remove it upon exit of that state.
By always having these two "meta" components at the front it makes it easy to spot entities where they are missing.
commands
.spawn((
Name::new("Player"),
cleanup::CleanupInGamePlayingExit,
...
))
You can read more about the cleanup pattern I'm using in the bevy cheatbook.
System Scheduling
Update systems should be bounded
All systems added to the Update
schedule should be bound by run conditions on State
and SystemSet
.
Run states enables easy enabling/disbling of groups of behaviour & reduces systems running when they don't need to.
For example, changing PlayingState
to PlayingState::Paused
will automatically disable all systems that progress the game and enable systems handle actions related to the pause menu.
System sets force coarse grained ordering leading to predictable behaviour between different parts of the game.
There can be exceptions to this, for example you may have background music or UI animations that should continue in both Playing
and Paused
.
.add_systems(
Update,
(handle_player_input, camera_view_update)
.chain()
.run_if(in_state(PlayingState::Playing))
.run_if(in_state(GameState::InGame))
.in_set(UpdateSet::Player),
)
State
Co-locate system registration for the same State transitions should have setup
and cleanup
specific systems. Their OnEnter
and OnExit
registration should be co-located.
This means it's easy to see the setup systems and that it has a cleanup system to run.
.add_systems(OnEnter(GameState::MainMenu), main_menu_setup)
.add_systems(OnExit(GameState::MainMenu), cleanup_system::<CleanupMenuClose>)
.add_systems(Update, (...).run_if(in_state(GameState::MainMenu)))
Events
Prefer Events for structuring logic and systems
Use Events to structure logic and communication between subsystems of your game.
Events allow different parts of your game to opt-in to information they need, and prevents tight coupling.
EventWriters
and EventReaders
are implemented as a thin layer over a vanilla Vec
so they're cheap to use, and subsequent send
s will re-use the allocated capacity. Systems that read from the same event can also run in parallel as EventReader
s are local to the system.
Here's an example of one way you might structure a projectile hitting an enemy, all the way to audio, visual effects, and achievements being updated. You should evaluate the use of events on a case by case basis, as they're not free, and for simple local operations it can be enough to mutate within the same system.
flowchart TD
Y[Send EnemyHit event]
EnemyHitEvent["EnemyHitEvent
- player
- enemy
- damage"]
ProjectileHitEvent["ProjectileHitEvent
- projectile
- enemy"]
subgraph physics
X[Projectile intersects Enemy] -.-> Y["EventWriter::#60;ProjectileHitEvent#62;::send()"]
end
Y --> ProjectileHitEvent
subgraph gameplay
hit_recv[Handle Projectile Hit]
Z["EventWriter::#60;EnemyHitEvent#62;::send()"]
end
ProjectileHitEvent --> hit_recv
hit_recv --> Z --> EnemyHitEvent
subgraph audio
audio_recv[Play Hit SFX]
end
subgraph vfx
vfx_recv[Play Hit VFX]
end
subgraph achievement
achievement_recv[Damage Total]
end
EnemyHitEvent --> audio_recv & vfx_recv & achievement_recv
Explicit ordering
Event readers should be ordered after their respective writers within the frame. Undefined ordering between writers and readers can lead to subtle out of order bugs. Delaying communication across frames is often not intentionally desired. If it is something you want it should be made explicit.
There are exceptions for systems like achievements or analytics, but I'd only recommend excluding them from ordering if you have a good reason. Often they will not be computationally intense, so having them all run at the end of frame is fine.
You can achieve this by using event_producer.before(event_consumer)
or (event_producer, event_consumer).chain()
when adding systems for systems within the same SystemSet
. For events that cross a SystemSet
boundary this should be taken care of by the ordering of the SystemSet
s in your app.configure_sets()
call.
Explicit event handling system run criteria
Systems that only do work based on an event should have that as part of their run condition.
fn handle_player_level_up_event(mut events: EventReader<PlayerLevelUpEvent>) {
events.iter().for_each(|e| {
// ...
});
}
handle_player_level_up_event.run_if(on_event::<PlayerLevelUpEvent>())
Helpers
Write helper utilities for common operations
Cleanup
Tag entities with a cleanup Zero Sized Type (ZST) component. We can then add our cleanup utility system with our new cleanup component as the type. This creates a simple and consistent way to remove all entities marked with the component when transitioning or exiting certain states.
#[derive(Component)]
struct CleanupInGamePlayingExit;
fn cleanup_system<T: Component>(mut commands: Commands, q: Query<Entity, With<T>>) {
q.for_each(|e| {
commands.entity(e).despawn_recursive();
});
}
// When spawning entities
commands.spawn((
Name::new("projectile"),
CleanupInGamePlayingExit,
...
));
// Add to state transition
.add_systems(
OnExit(GameState::InGame),
cleanup_system::<CleanupInGamePlayingExit>,
)
Credit to bevy cheatbook.
Getter Macros
When working with queries and the Entity
type, often you'll be matching on the outcome to exit early if the entity was not found.
The tedium of writing match expressions all over the place to return early can be avoided through a few simple macros. I've provided a one but you can imagine more variations based on the methods on Query
.
Do be careful when using these, as opposed to the panicing methods like query.single()
, these will silently return. This may be appropriate for your game, however it could also lead to bugs and unusual behaviour if they were supposed to succeed.
You could even make variations of these that return in release but panic in debug if that fits your use case.
fn print_window_size(windows: Query<&Window>) {
let window = get_single!(windows);
println!("Window Size: {}", window.resolution);
}
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! get_single {
($q:expr) => {
match $q.get_single() {
Ok(m) => m,
_ => return,
}
};
}
Project Structuring
Prelude
Bevy utlises a prelude module to great effect for easy access to common imports. We can do the same!
By creating a prelude module in our project and exporting the various types that are commonly used within our game we can greatly cut down on the number of imports we need to maintain. You can also bring in the preludes from commonly used dependencies if you like. I have done that here with bevy and rand.
A nice side effect of this pattern is moving around code or refactoring doesn't require changes in as many places. If you restructure your audio code, you only need to update how it's presented in the prelude, assuming the rest of your project utilises the prelude.
src/audio.rs
pub(crate) mod prelude {
pub(crate) use super::{EventPlaySFX, SFXKind};
}
#[derive(Event)]
pub(crate) struct EventPlaySFX { /* ... */ }
pub(crate) enum SFXKind { /* ... */ }
src/prelude.rs
pub(crate) use bevy::prelude::*;
pub(crate) use rand::prelude::*;
// Common items available at the root of the prelude
pub(crate) use crate::{Enemy, Health};
// Specific areas nested within their own module for self documenting use
pub(crate) mod audio {
pub(crate) use crate::audio::prelude::*;
}
pub(crate) mod physics { /* ... */ }
src/enemy.rs
use crate::prelude::*;
fn handle_enemy_health_changed(
mut commands: Commands,
enemies: Query<(&Health, Entity), (With<Enemy>, Changed<Health>)>,
mut play_sfx: EventWriter<audio::EventPlaySFX>,
) {
enemies.for_each(|(health, id)| {
if health.current <= 0. {
commands.entity(id).despawn_recursive();
play_sfx.send(audio::EventPlaySFX::new(audio::SFXKind::EnemyDeath));
}
});
}
Plugins
Bevy Plugins enable grouping systems, components, and resources into logical units. They're used heavily in Bevy itself and are what powers the ability to turn on/off parts of the engine.
By constructing your game out of plugins you make it easier to find, work with, and debug subsystems. It also contextualises the setup and configuration of 3rd party crates to where they belong. For example, setting up the resources, plugins, and systems to utilise a 3rd party terrain library would go in your TerrainPlugin
. That way, disabling your own terrain plugin will also disable the library you've imported, and any other resources that only it needed.
Note
Your mileage may vary with "enabling"/"disabling" plugins in your game. Bevy implements it in engine because it's valuable to disable chunks of the engine. However to achieve this in the game itself is not only more difficult, but the payoff is lower. How often will you realistically want to remove physics or audio from your game?
src/audio.rs
pub(crate) struct AudioPlugin;
impl Plugin for AudioPlugin {
fn build(&self, app: &mut App) {
app.add_plugins(some_audio_library::AudioFXPlugin)
.init_resource::<MyAudioSettings>()
.add_systems(...);
}
}
src/physics.rs
pub(crate) struct PhysicsPlugin;
impl Plugin for PhysicsPlugin {
fn build(&self, app: &mut App) {
app.add_plugins(some_physics_library::BouncyPhysicsPlugin)
.init_resource::<MyPhysicsSettings>()
.add_systems(...);
}
}
src/game.rs
pub(crate) struct GamePlugin;
impl Plugin for GamePlugin {
fn build(&self, app: &mut App) {
app.add_plugins((
DefaultPlugins,
crate::AudioPlugin,
crate::PhysicsPlugin,
));
}
}
src/main.rs
fn main() {
bevy::prelude::App::new()
.add_plugins(crate::game::GamePlugin)
.run();
}
License
Except where noted, all code in this repository is dual-licensed under either:
- MIT License (LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
- Apache License, Version 2.0 (LICENSE-APACHE or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
at your option. This means you can select the license you prefer! This dual-licensing approach is the de-facto standard in the Rust ecosystem and there are very good reasons to include both.
Your contributions
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the work by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.