atomic_queue
C++14 multiple-producer-multiple-consumer lock-free queues based on circular buffer with std::atomic
.
It has been developed, tested and benchmarked on Linux, but should support any C++14 platforms which implement std::atomic
.
These queues have been designed with a goal to minimize the latency between one thread pushing an element into a queue and another thread popping it from the queue.
Design Principles
When minimizing latency a good design is not when there is nothing left to add, but rather when there is nothing left to remove, as these queues exemplify.
The main design principle these queues follow is minimalism, which results in such design choices as:
- Bare minimum of atomic instructions. Inlinable by default push and pop functions can hardly be any cheaper in terms of CPU instruction number / L1i cache pressure.
- Explicit contention/false-sharing avoidance for queue and its elements.
- Linear fixed size ring-buffer array. No heap memory allocations after a queue object has constructed. It doesn't get any more CPU L1d or TLB cache friendly than that.
- Value semantics. Meaning that the queues make a copy/move upon
push
/pop
, no reference/pointer to elements in the queue can be obtained.
The impact of each of these small design choices on their own is barely measurable, but their total impact is much greater than a simple sum of the constituents' impacts, aka super-scalar compounding or synergy. The synergy emerging from combining multiple of these small design choices together is what allows CPUs to perform at their peak capacities least impeded.
These design choices are also limitations:
- The maximum queue size must be set at compile time or construction time. The circular buffer side-steps the memory reclamation problem inherent in linked-list based queues for the price of fixed buffer size. See Effective memory reclamation for lock-free data structures in C++ for more details. Fixed buffer size may not be that much of a limitation, since once the queue gets larger than the maximum expected size that indicates a problem that elements aren't consumed fast enough, and if the queue keeps growing it may eventually consume all available memory which may affect the entire system, rather than the problematic process only. The only apparent inconvenience is that one has to do an upfront calculation on what would be the largest expected/acceptable number of unconsumed elements in the queue.
- There are no OS-blocking push/pop functions. This queue is designed for ultra-low-latency scenarios and using an OS blocking primitive would be sacrificing push-to-pop latency. For lowest possible latency one cannot afford blocking in the OS kernel because the wake-up latency of a blocked thread is about 1-3 microseconds, whereas this queue's round-trip time can be as low as 150 nanoseconds.
Ultra-low-latency applications need just that and nothing more. The minimalism pays off, see the throughput and latency benchmarks.
Available containers are:
AtomicQueue
- a fixed size ring-buffer for atomic elements.OptimistAtomicQueue
- a faster fixed size ring-buffer for atomic elements which busy-waits when empty or full. It isAtomicQueue
used withpush
/pop
instead oftry_push
/try_pop
.AtomicQueue2
- a fixed size ring-buffer for non-atomic elements.OptimistAtomicQueue2
- a faster fixed size ring-buffer for non-atomic elements which busy-waits when empty or full. It isAtomicQueue2
used withpush
/pop
instead oftry_push
/try_pop
.
These containers have corresponding AtomicQueueB
, OptimistAtomicQueueB
, AtomicQueueB2
, OptimistAtomicQueueB2
versions where the buffer size is specified as an argument to the constructor.
Totally ordered mode is supported. In this mode consumers receive messages in the same FIFO order the messages were posted. This mode is supported for push
and pop
functions, but for not the try_
versions. On Intel x86 the totally ordered mode has 0 cost, as of 2019.
Single-producer-single-consumer mode is supported. In this mode, no expensive atomic read-modify-write CPU instructions are necessary, only the cheapest atomic loads and stores. That improves queue throughput significantly.
Move-only queue element types are fully supported. For example, a queue of std::unique_ptr<T>
elements would be AtomicQueue2B<std::unique_ptr<T>>
or AtomicQueue2<std::unique_ptr<T>, CAPACITY>
.
Role Models
Several other well established and popular thread-safe containers are used for reference in the benchmarks:
std::mutex
- a fixed size ring-buffer withstd::mutex
.pthread_spinlock
- a fixed size ring-buffer withpthread_spinlock_t
.boost::lockfree::spsc_queue
- a wait-free single-producer-single-consumer queue from Boost library.boost::lockfree::queue
- a lock-free multiple-producer-multiple-consumer queue from Boost library.moodycamel::ConcurrentQueue
- a lock-free multiple-producer-multiple-consumer queue used in non-blocking mode. This queue is designed to maximize throughput at the expense of latency and eschewing the global time order of elements pushed into one queue by different threads. It is not equivalent to other queues benchmarked here in this respect.moodycamel::ReaderWriterQueue
- a lock-free single-producer-single-consumer queue used in non-blocking mode.xenium::michael_scott_queue
- a lock-free multi-producer-multi-consumer queue proposed by Michael and Scott (this queue is similar toboost::lockfree::queue
which is also based on the same proposal).xenium::ramalhete_queue
- a lock-free multi-producer-multi-consumer queue proposed by Ramalhete and Correia.xenium::vyukov_bounded_queue
- a bounded multi-producer-multi-consumer queue based on the version proposed by Vyukov.tbb::spin_mutex
- a locked fixed size ring-buffer withtbb::spin_mutex
from Intel Threading Building Blocks.tbb::concurrent_bounded_queue
- eponymous queue used in non-blocking mode from Intel Threading Building Blocks.
Using the library
The containers provided are header-only class templates, no building/installing is necessary.
Install from GitHub
- Clone the project:
git clone https://github.com/max0x7ba/atomic_queue.git
- Add
atomic_queue/include
directory (use full path) to the include paths of your build system. #include <atomic_queue/atomic_queue.h>
in your C++ source.
Install using vcpkg
vcpkg install atomic-queue
Benchmark build and run instructions
The containers provided are header-only class templates that require only #include <atomic_queue/atomic_queue.h>
, no building/installing is necessary.
Building is necessary to run the tests and benchmarks.
git clone https://github.com/cameron314/concurrentqueue.git
git clone https://github.com/cameron314/readerwriterqueue.git
git clone https://github.com/mpoeter/xenium.git
git clone https://github.com/max0x7ba/atomic_queue.git
cd atomic_queue
make -r -j4 run_benchmarks
The benchmark also requires Intel TBB library to be available. It assumes that it is installed in /usr/local/include
and /usr/local/lib
. If it is installed elsewhere you may like to modify cppflags.tbb
and ldlibs.tbb
in Makefile
.
API
The containers support the following APIs:
try_push
- Appends an element to the end of the queue. Returnsfalse
when the queue is full.try_pop
- Removes an element from the front of the queue. Returnsfalse
when the queue is empty.push
(optimist) - Appends an element to the end of the queue. Busy waits when the queue is full. Faster thantry_push
when the queue is not full. Optional FIFO producer queuing and total order.pop
(optimist) - Removes an element from the front of the queue. Busy waits when the queue is empty. Faster thantry_pop
when the queue is not empty. Optional FIFO consumer queuing and total order.was_size
- Returns the number of unconsumed elements during the call. The state may have changed by the time the return value is examined.was_empty
- Returnstrue
if the container was empty during the call. The state may have changed by the time the return value is examined.was_full
- Returnstrue
if the container was full during the call. The state may have changed by the time the return value is examined.capacity
- Returns the maximum number of elements the queue can possibly hold.
Atomic elements are those, for which std::atomic<T>{T{}}.is_lock_free()
returns true
, and, when C++17 features are available, std::atomic<T>::is_always_lock_free
evaluates to true
at compile time. In other words, the CPU can load, store and compare-and-exchange such elements atomically natively. On x86-64 such elements are all the C++ standard arithmetic and pointer types. The queues for atomic elements reserve one value to serve as an empty element marker NIL
, its default value is 0
. NIL
value must not be pushed into a queue and there is an assert
statement in push
functions to guard against that in debug mode builds. Pushing NIL
element into a queue in release mode builds results in undefined behaviour, such as deadlocks and/or lost queue elements.
Note that optimism is a choice of a queue modification operation control flow, rather than a queue type. An optimist push
is fastest when the queue is not full most of the time, an optimistic pop
- when the queue is not empty most of the time. Optimistic and not so operations can be mixed with no restrictions. The OptimistAtomicQueue
s in the benchmarks use only optimist push
and pop
.
push
and try_push
operations synchronize-with (as defined in std::memory_order
) with any subsequent pop
or try_pop
operation of the same queue object.
See example.cc for a usage example.
TODO: full API reference.
Implementation Notes
Ring-buffer capacity
The available queues here use a ring-buffer array for storing elements. The capacity of the queue is fixed at compile time or construction time.
In a production multiple-producer-multiple-consumer scenario the ring-buffer capacity should be set to the maximum expected queue size. When the ring-buffer gets full it means that the consumers cannot consume the elements fast enough. A fix for that is any of:
- Increase the queue capacity in order to handle temporary spikes of pending elements in the queue. This normally requires restarting the application after re-configuration/re-compilation has been done.
- Increase the number of consumers to drain the queue faster. The number of consumers can be managed dynamically, e.g.: when a consumer observes that the number of elements pending in the queue keeps growing, that calls for deploying more consumer threads to drain the queue at a faster rate; mostly empty queue calls for suspending/terminating excess consumer threads.
- Decrease the rate of pushing elements into the queue.
push
andpop
calls always incur some expensive CPU cycles to maintain the integrity of queue state in atomic/consistent/isolated fashion with respect to other threads and these costs increase super-linearly as queue contention grows. Producer batching of multiple small elements or elements resulting from one event into one queue message is often a reasonable solution.
Using a power-of-2 ring-buffer array size allows a couple of important optimizations:
- The writer and reader indexes get mapped into the ring-buffer array index using remainder binary operator
% SIZE
. Remainder binary operator%
normally generates a division CPU instruction which isn't cheap, but using a power-of-2 size turns that remainder operator into one cheap binaryand
CPU instruction and that is as fast as it gets. - The element index within the cache line gets swapped with the cache line index, so that consecutive queue elements reside in different cache lines. This massively reduces cache line contention between multiple producers and multiple consumers. Instead of
N
producers together withM
consumers competing on subsequent elements in the same ring-buffer cache line in the worst case, it is only one producer competing with one consumer (pedantically, when the number of CPUs is not greater than the number of elements that can fit in one cache line). This optimisation scales better with the number of producers and consumers, and element size. With low number of producers and consumers (up to about 2 of each in these benchmarks) disabling this optimisation may yield better throughput (but higher variance across runs).
The containers use unsigned
type for size and internal indexes. On x86-64 platform unsigned
is 32-bit wide, whereas size_t
is 64-bit wide. 64-bit instructions utilise an extra byte instruction prefix resulting in slightly more pressure on the CPU instruction cache and the front-end. Hence, 32-bit unsigned
indexes are used to maximise performance. That limits the queue size to 4,294,967,295 elements, which seems to be a reasonable hard limit for many applications.
While the atomic queues can be used with any moveable element types (including std::unique_ptr
), for best throughput and latency the queue elements should be cheap to copy and lock-free (e.g. unsigned
or T*
), so that push
and pop
operations complete fastest.
Lock-free guarantees
Conceptually, a push
or pop
operation does two atomic steps:
- Atomically and exclusively claims the queue slot index to store/load an element to/from. That's producers incrementing
head
index, consumers incrementingtail
index. - Atomically store/load the element into/from the slot. Producers storing into a slot change its state to be non-
NIL
, consumers loading from a slot change its state to beNIL
.
These queues anticipate that a thread doing push
or pop
may complete step 1 and then be preempted before completing step 2.
An algorithm is lock-free if there is guaranteed system-wide progress. These queue guarantee system-wide progress by the following properties:
- Each
push
is independent of any precedingpush
. An incomplete (preempted)push
by one producer thread doesn't affectpush
of any other thread. - Each
pop
is independent of any precedingpop
. An incomplete (preempted)pop
by one consumer thread doesn't affectpop
of any other thread. - An incomplete (preempted)
push
from one producer thread affects only one consumer threadpop
ing an element from this particular queue slot. All other threadspop
s are unaffected. - An incomplete (preempted)
pop
from one consumer thread affects only one producer threadpush
ing an element into this particular queue slot while expecting it to have been consumed long time ago, in the rather unlikely scenario that producers have wrapped around the entire ring-buffer while this consumer hasn't completed itspop
. All other threadspush
s andpop
s are unaffected.
Preemption
Linux task scheduler thread preemption is something no user-space process should be able to affect or escape, otherwise any/every malicious application would exploit that.
Still, there are a few things one can do to minimize preemption of one's mission critical application threads:
- Use real-time
SCHED_FIFO
scheduling class for your threads, e.g.chrt --fifo 50 <app>
. A higher prioritySCHED_FIFO
thread or kernel interrupt handler can still preempt yourSCHED_FIFO
threads. - Disable real-time thread throttling to prevent
SCHED_FIFO
real-time threads from being throttled. - Isolate CPU cores, so that no interrupt handlers or applications ever run on it. Mission critical applications should be explicitly placed on these isolated cores with
taskset
. - Pin threads to specific cores, otherwise the task scheduler keeps moving threads to other idle CPU cores to level voltage/heat-induced wear-and-tear accross CPU cores. Keeping a thread running on one same CPU core maximizes CPU cache hit rate. Moving a thread to another CPU core incurs otherwise unnecessary CPU cache thrashing.
People often propose limiting busy-waiting with a subsequent call to sched_yield
/pthread_yield
. However, sched_yield
is a wrong tool for locking because it doesn't communicate to the OS kernel what the thread is waiting for, so that the OS thread scheduler can never reschedule the calling thread to resume when the shared state has changed (unless there are no other threads that can run on this CPU core, so that the caller resumes immediately). More details about sched_yield
and spinlocks from Linus Torvalds.
In Linux, there is mutex type PTHREAD_MUTEX_ADAPTIVE_NP
which busy-waits a locked mutex for a number of iterations and then makes a blocking syscall into the kernel to deschedule the waiting thread. In the benchmarks it was the worst performer and I couldn't find a way to make it perform better, and that's the reason it is not included in the benchmarks.
On Intel CPUs one could use the 4 debug control registers to monitor the spinlock memory region for write access and wait on it using select
(and its friends) or sigwait
(see perf_event_open
and uapi/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
for more details). A spinlock waiter could suspend itself with select
or sigwait
until the spinlock state has been updated. But there are only 4 of these registers, so that such a solution wouldn't scale.
Benchmarks
View throughput and latency benchmarks charts.
Methodology
There are a few OS behaviours that complicate benchmarking:
- CPU scheduler can place threads on different CPU cores each run. To avoid that the threads are pinned to specific CPU cores.
- CPU scheduler can preempt threads. To avoid that real-time
SCHED_FIFO
priority 50 is used to disable scheduler time quantum expiry and make the threads non-preemptable by lower priority processes/threads. - Real-time thread throttling disabled.
- Adverse address space randomisation may cause extra CPU cache conflicts, as well as other processes running on the system. To minimise effects of that
benchmarks
executable is run at least 33 times. The benchmark charts show the average; the standard deviation, minimum and maximum values are shown in the chart tooltips.
I only have access to a few x86-64 machines. If you have access to different hardware feel free to submit the output file of scripts/run-benchmarks.sh
and I will include your results into the benchmarks page.
Huge pages
When huge pages are available the benchmarks use 1x1GB or 16x2MB huge pages for the queues to minimise TLB misses. To enable huge pages do one of:
sudo hugeadm --pool-pages-min 1GB:1 --pool-pages-max 1GB:1
sudo hugeadm --pool-pages-min 2MB:16 --pool-pages-max 2MB:16
Alternatively, you may like to enable transparent hugepages in your system and use a hugepage-aware allocator, such as tcmalloc.
Real-time thread throttling
By default, Linux scheduler throttles real-time threads from consuming 100% of CPU and that is detrimental to benchmarking. Full details can be found in Real-Time group scheduling. To disable real-time thread throttling do:
echo -1 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us >/dev/null
Throughput and scalability benchmark
N producer threads push a 4-byte integer into one same queue, N consumer threads pop the integers from the queue. All producers posts 1,000,000 messages in total. Total time to send and receive all the messages is measured. The benchmark is run for from 1 producer and 1 consumer up to (total-number-of-cpus / 2)
producers/consumers to measure the scalability of different queues.
Ping-pong benchmark
One thread posts an integer to another thread through one queue and waits for a reply from another queue (2 queues in total). The benchmarks measures the total time of 100,000 ping-pongs, best of 10 runs. Contention is minimal here (1-producer-1-consumer, 1 element in the queue) to be able to achieve and measure the lowest latency. Reports the average round-trip time.
Contributing
The project uses .editorconfig
and .clang-format
to automate formatting. Pull requests are expected to be formatted using these settings.
Copyright (c) 2019 Maxim Egorushkin. MIT License. See the full licence in file LICENSE.