🌈
lockfile linting lint lockfiles for improved security and trust policies
About
Lockfiles are used as trusted whitelist of resources manifest to fetch packages from. However, keeping track of the changes introduced to lockfiles is not an easy task as they are designed to be consumed by machines 🤖.
What happens when someone creates a Pull Request and sneaks a malicious resource package that replaces a real library? 😱
Exactly! Lint your lockfiles to ensure they adhere to pre-defined security policies and mitigate this vector of attack.
Why is this important? read: Why npm lockfiles can be a security blindspot for injecting malicious modules
Usage
Easily invoked with npx on any project and lint it:
npx lockfile-lint --path yarn.lock --allowed-hosts npm yarn --validate-https
To lint the npm-shrinkwrap.json file, add the --type npm
flag:
npx lockfile-lint --path npm-shrinkwrap.json --type npm --allowed-hosts npm yarn --validate-https
If you get no results, congratulations, the file passes!
If lockfile-lint detects exceptions to the policies it will report them:
Refer to lockfile-lint for more details on the CLI usage.
You can use lockfile-lint
as a standalone CLI tool, or as an API library using the following npm packages:
- lockfile-lint - a CLI tool that can be easily integrated as a pre-commit hook or part of a CI/build
- lockfile-lint-api - a library providing a programmatic API
Security Disclaimer
Please be advised of the following security disclaimers that are outside of the control of a lockfile linter:
When you whitelist all hosts from npmjs, yarnpkg, github or other registries you implicitly convey that you trust all the packages originating from these sources. As such, a malicious package can exist in a registry source that you whitelist. Direct dependencies that you should add to a project should be well vetted before adding such as using a tool like npq.
References
- Secure Nodejs Guidelines section on Lockfile Attack
- pnpm's lockfile injection #4361
- yarn's lockfile injection #4136
FAQ
What about pnpm support?
pnpm doesn't maintain the tarball source of an npm package so unlike yarn, and npm, there's no way to inject an attacker-controlled malicious source file in pnpm-lock.yaml
. Other vectors that were explored were to inject new packages into the lockfile (that aren't in package.json
) yet pnpm isn't prone to these malicious attempts and would not install them.
If you have witnessed a possible attack vector on pnpm's lockfile, please open an issue with reproducible steps.
npm audit
?
How is this different from npm audit
is a tool to audit your dependencies for known vulnerabilities. However, it doesn't address the issue of malicious packages being injected into your lockfile. lockfile-lint
is a tool that is designed to address this issue.
Author
lockfile-lint © Liran Tal, Released under the Apache-2.0 License.