babel-plugin-transform-typescript-metadata
Babel plugin to emit decorator metadata like typescript compiler
Motivation
TypeScript Decorators allows advanced reflection patterns when combined
with Reflect.metadata
output.
Current @babel/preset-typescript
implementation however just strips all types and
does not emit the relative Metadata in the output code.
Since this kind of information is used extensively in libraries like
Nest and TypeORM
to implement advanced features like Dependency Injection, I've thought it would
be awesome to be able to provide the same functionality that TypeScript
compiler experimentalDecorators
and emitDecoratorMetadata
flags provide.
This means that code like:
import { Injectable, Inject } from 'some-di-library'; // Just an example
import { MyService } from './MyService';
import { Configuration } from './Configuration';
@Injectable()
class AnotherService {
@Inject()
config: Configuration;
constructor(private service: MyService) {}
}
will be interpreted like:
import { MyService } from './MyService';
import { Configuration } from './Configuration';
@Injectable()
@Reflect.metadata('design:paramtypes', [MyService])
class AnotherService {
@Inject()
@Reflect.metadata('design:type', Configuration)
config: Configuration;
constructor(private service: MyService) {}
}
Parameter decorators
Since decorators in typescript supports also Parameters, this plugin also provides support for them, enabling the following syntax:
@Injectable()
class Some {
constructor(@Inject() private: SomeService);
}
This will be roughly translated to:
// ...
Inject()(Some.prototype, undefined, 0);
Installation
With npm:
npm install --dev --save babel-plugin-transform-typescript-metadata
or with Yarn:
yarn add --dev babel-plugin-transform-typescript-metadata
Usage
With .babelrc
:
Note: should be placed before
@babel/plugin-proposal-decorators
.
{
"plugins": [
"babel-plugin-transform-typescript-metadata",
["@babel/plugin-proposal-decorators", { "legacy": true }],
["@babel/plugin-proposal-class-properties", { "loose": true }],
],
"presets": [
"@babel/preset-typescript"
]
}
InversifyJS
Usage withIf you are using normal dependency injection letting Inversify create your instances, you should be fine with all kind of decorators.
Instead, if you are using property injection, when the container does not create the instances, you would likely encounter errors since babel decorators are not exactly the same as TypeScript.
You can fix it by enhancing property decorators with the following function:
import getDecorators from 'inversify-inject-decorators';
// setup the container...
let { lazyInject: originalLazyInject } = getDecorators(container);
// Additional function to make properties decorators compatible with babel.
function fixPropertyDecorator<T extends Function>(decorator: T): T {
return ((...args: any[]) => (
target: any,
propertyName: any,
...decoratorArgs: any[]
) => {
decorator(...args)(target, propertyName, ...decoratorArgs);
return Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(target, propertyName);
}) as any;
}
export const lazyInject = fixPropertyDecorator(originalLazyInject);
Current Pitfalls
-
If you are using webpack and it complains about missing exports due to types not being removed, you can switch from
import { MyType } from ...
toimport type { MyType } from ...
. See #46 for details and examples. -
We cannot know if type annotations are just types (i.e.
IMyInterface
) or concrete values (like classes, etc.). In order to resolve this, we emit the following:typeof Type === 'undefined' ? Object : Type
. The code has the advantage of not throwing. If you know a better way to do this, let me know!