• Stars
    star
    216
  • Rank 183,179 (Top 4 %)
  • Language
    JavaScript
  • License
    MIT License
  • Created over 5 years ago
  • Updated about 1 year ago

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Be the first to send feedback to the community and the maintainers!

Repository Details

Babel plugin to emit decorator metadata like typescript compiler

babel-plugin-transform-typescript-metadata

GitHub Workflow Build Status Codecov npm

Babel plugin to emit decorator metadata like typescript compiler

Motivation

TypeScript Decorators allows advanced reflection patterns when combined with Reflect.metadata output.

Current @babel/preset-typescript implementation however just strips all types and does not emit the relative Metadata in the output code.

Since this kind of information is used extensively in libraries like Nest and TypeORM to implement advanced features like Dependency Injection, I've thought it would be awesome to be able to provide the same functionality that TypeScript compiler experimentalDecorators and emitDecoratorMetadata flags provide.

This means that code like:

import { Injectable, Inject } from 'some-di-library'; // Just an example
import { MyService } from './MyService';
import { Configuration } from './Configuration';

@Injectable()
class AnotherService {
  @Inject()
  config: Configuration;

  constructor(private service: MyService) {}
}

will be interpreted like:

import { MyService } from './MyService';
import { Configuration } from './Configuration';

@Injectable()
@Reflect.metadata('design:paramtypes', [MyService])
class AnotherService {
  @Inject()
  @Reflect.metadata('design:type', Configuration)
  config: Configuration;

  constructor(private service: MyService) {}
}

Parameter decorators

Since decorators in typescript supports also Parameters, this plugin also provides support for them, enabling the following syntax:

@Injectable()
class Some {
  constructor(@Inject() private: SomeService);
}

This will be roughly translated to:

// ...
Inject()(Some.prototype, undefined, 0);

Installation

With npm:

npm install --dev --save babel-plugin-transform-typescript-metadata

or with Yarn:

yarn add --dev babel-plugin-transform-typescript-metadata

Usage

With .babelrc:

Note: should be placed before @babel/plugin-proposal-decorators.

{
  "plugins": [
    "babel-plugin-transform-typescript-metadata",
    ["@babel/plugin-proposal-decorators", { "legacy": true }],
    ["@babel/plugin-proposal-class-properties", { "loose": true }],
  ],
  "presets": [
    "@babel/preset-typescript"
  ]
}

Usage with InversifyJS

If you are using normal dependency injection letting Inversify create your instances, you should be fine with all kind of decorators.

Instead, if you are using property injection, when the container does not create the instances, you would likely encounter errors since babel decorators are not exactly the same as TypeScript.

You can fix it by enhancing property decorators with the following function:

import getDecorators from 'inversify-inject-decorators';
// setup the container...
let { lazyInject: originalLazyInject } = getDecorators(container);

// Additional function to make properties decorators compatible with babel.
function fixPropertyDecorator<T extends Function>(decorator: T): T {
  return ((...args: any[]) => (
    target: any,
    propertyName: any,
    ...decoratorArgs: any[]
  ) => {
    decorator(...args)(target, propertyName, ...decoratorArgs);
    return Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(target, propertyName);
  }) as any;
}

export const lazyInject = fixPropertyDecorator(originalLazyInject);

Current Pitfalls

  • If you are using webpack and it complains about missing exports due to types not being removed, you can switch from import { MyType } from ... to import type { MyType } from .... See #46 for details and examples.

  • We cannot know if type annotations are just types (i.e. IMyInterface) or concrete values (like classes, etc.). In order to resolve this, we emit the following: typeof Type === 'undefined' ? Object : Type. The code has the advantage of not throwing. If you know a better way to do this, let me know!