• Stars
    star
    263
  • Rank 155,624 (Top 4 %)
  • Language
    Go
  • License
    Apache License 2.0
  • Created over 8 years ago
  • Updated over 1 year ago

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Be the first to send feedback to the community and the maintainers!

Repository Details

Distributed database benchmark tester

dbtester

Build Status Godoc

Distributed database benchmark tester: etcd, Zookeeper, Consul, zetcd, cetcd

It includes github.com/golang/freetype, which is based in part on the work of the FreeType Team.




Performance Analysis




Project

dbtester system architecture

For etcd, we recommend etcd benchmark tool.

All logs and results can be found at https://github.com/etcd-io/dbtester/tree/master/test-results or https://console.cloud.google.com/storage/browser/dbtester-results/?authuser=0&project=etcd-development.




Noticeable Warnings: Zookeeper

Snapshot, when writing 1-million entries (256-byte key, 1KB value value), with 500 concurrent clients

# snapshot warnings
cd 2017Q1-00-etcd-zookeeper-consul/02-write-1M-keys-best-throughput
grep -r -i fsync-ing\ the zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-* | less

2017-02-10 18:55:38,997 [myid:3] - WARN  [SyncThread:3:SyncRequestProcessor@148] - Too busy to snap, skipping
2017-02-10 18:55:38,998 [myid:3] - INFO  [SyncThread:3:FileTxnLog@203] - Creating new log file: log.1000c0c51
2017-02-10 18:55:40,855 [myid:3] - INFO  [SyncThread:3:FileTxnLog@203] - Creating new log file: log.1000cd2e6
2017-02-10 18:55:40,855 [myid:3] - INFO  [Snapshot Thread:FileTxnSnapLog@240] - Snapshotting: 0x1000cd1ca to /home/gyuho/zookeeper/zookeeper.data/version-2/snapshot.1000cd1ca
2017-02-10 18:55:46,382 [myid:3] - WARN  [SyncThread:3:FileTxnLog@338] - fsync-ing the write ahead log in SyncThread:3 took 1062ms which will adversely effect operation latency. See the ZooKeeper troubleshooting guide
2017-02-10 18:55:47,471 [myid:3] - WARN  [SyncThread:3:FileTxnLog@338] - fsync-ing the write ahead log in SyncThread:3 took 1084ms which will adversely effect operation latency. See the ZooKeeper troubleshooting guide
2017-02-10 18:55:49,425 [myid:3] - WARN  [SyncThread:3:FileTxnLog@338] - fsync-ing the write ahead log in SyncThread:3 took 1142ms which will adversely effect operation latency. See the ZooKeeper troubleshooting guide
2017-02-10 18:55:51,188 [myid:3] - WARN  [SyncThread:3:FileTxnLog@338] - fsync-ing the write ahead log in SyncThread:3 took 1201ms which will adversely effect operation latency. See the ZooKeeper troubleshooting guide
2017-02-10 18:55:52,292 [myid:3] - WARN  [SyncThread:3:FileTxnLog@338] - fsync-ing the write ahead log in SyncThread:3 took 1102ms which will adversely effect operation latency. See the ZooKeeper troubleshooting guide

When writing more than 2-million entries (256-byte key, 1KB value value) with 500 concurrent clients

# leader election
cd 2017Q1-00-etcd-zookeeper-consul/04-write-too-many-keys
grep -r -i election\ took  zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-* | less

# leader election is taking more than 10 seconds...
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:22:16,549 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Follower@61] - FOLLOWING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 22978
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:23:02,279 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Leader@361] - LEADING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 10210
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:23:14,498 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Leader@361] - LEADING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 203
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:23:36,303 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Leader@361] - LEADING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 9791
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:23:52,151 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Leader@361] - LEADING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 3836
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:24:13,849 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Leader@361] - LEADING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 9686
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:24:29,694 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Leader@361] - LEADING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 3573
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:24:51,392 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Leader@361] - LEADING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 8686
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:25:07,231 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Leader@361] - LEADING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 3827
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:25:28,940 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Leader@361] - LEADING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 9697
zookeeper-r3.4.9-java8-2-database.log:2017-02-10 19:25:44,772 [myid:2] - INFO  [QuorumPeer[myid=2]/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:2181:Leader@361] - LEADING - LEADER ELECTION TOOK - 3820




Noticeable Warnings: Consul

Snapshot, when writing 1-million entries (256-byte key, 1KB value value), with 500 concurrent clients

# snapshot warnings
cd 2017Q1-00-etcd-zookeeper-consul/02-write-1M-keys-best-throughput
grep -r -i installed\ remote consul-v0.7.4-go1.7.5-* | less

    2017/02/10 18:58:43 [INFO] snapshot: Creating new snapshot at /home/gyuho/consul.data/raft/snapshots/2-900345-1486753123478.tmp
    2017/02/10 18:58:45 [INFO] snapshot: reaping snapshot /home/gyuho/consul.data/raft/snapshots/2-849399-1486753096972
    2017/02/10 18:58:46 [INFO] raft: Copied 1223270573 bytes to local snapshot
    2017/02/10 18:58:55 [INFO] raft: Compacting logs from 868354 to 868801
    2017/02/10 18:58:56 [INFO] raft: Installed remote snapshot
    2017/02/10 18:58:57 [INFO] snapshot: Creating new snapshot at /home/gyuho/consul.data/raft/snapshots/2-911546-1486753137827.tmp
    2017/02/10 18:58:59 [INFO] consul.fsm: snapshot created in 32.255Β΅s
    2017/02/10 18:59:01 [INFO] snapshot: reaping snapshot /home/gyuho/consul.data/raft/snapshots/2-873921-1486753116619
    2017/02/10 18:59:02 [INFO] raft: Copied 1238491373 bytes to local snapshot
    2017/02/10 18:59:11 [INFO] raft: Compacting logs from 868802 to 868801
    2017/02/10 18:59:11 [INFO] raft: Installed remote snapshot

Logs do not tell much but average latency spikes (e.g. from 70.27517 ms to 10407.900082 ms)

2017Q2-01-write-1M-cpu-client-scaling

2017Q2-02-write-1M-network-traffic-best-throughput

2017Q2-01-write-1M-throughput-client-scaling

2017Q2-02-write-1M-latency-best-throughput




Write 1M keys, 256-byte key, 1KB value, Best Throughput (etcd 1K clients with 100 conns, Zookeeper 700, Consul 500 clients)
  • Google Cloud Compute Engine
  • 4 machines of 16 vCPUs + 60 GB Memory + 300 GB SSD (1 for client)
  • Ubuntu 17.10 (GNU/Linux kernel 4.13.0-25-generic)
  • ulimit -n is 120000
  • etcd v3.3.0 (Go 1.9.2)
  • Zookeeper r3.5.3-beta
    • Java 8
    • javac 1.8.0_151
    • Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_151-b12)
    • Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.151-b12, mixed mode)
    • /usr/bin/java -Djute.maxbuffer=33554432 -Xms50G -Xmx50G
  • Consul v1.0.2 (Go 1.9.2)
+---------------------------------------+---------------------+-----------------------------+-----------------------+
|                                       | etcd-v3.3.0-go1.9.2 | zookeeper-r3.5.3-beta-java8 | consul-v1.0.2-go1.9.2 |
+---------------------------------------+---------------------+-----------------------------+-----------------------+
|                         TOTAL-SECONDS |         28.3623 sec |                 59.2167 sec |          178.9443 sec |
|                  TOTAL-REQUEST-NUMBER |           1,000,000 |                   1,000,000 |             1,000,000 |
|                        MAX-THROUGHPUT |      37,330 req/sec |              25,124 req/sec |        15,865 req/sec |
|                        AVG-THROUGHPUT |      35,258 req/sec |              16,842 req/sec |         5,588 req/sec |
|                        MIN-THROUGHPUT |      13,505 req/sec |                  20 req/sec |             0 req/sec |
|                       FASTEST-LATENCY |           4.6073 ms |                   2.9094 ms |            11.6604 ms |
|                           AVG-LATENCY |          28.2625 ms |                  30.9499 ms |            89.4351 ms |
|                       SLOWEST-LATENCY |         117.4918 ms |                4564.6788 ms |          4616.2947 ms |
|                           Latency p10 |        13.508626 ms |                 9.068163 ms |          30.408863 ms |
|                           Latency p25 |        16.869586 ms |                 9.351597 ms |          34.224021 ms |
|                           Latency p50 |        22.167478 ms |                10.093377 ms |          39.881181 ms |
|                           Latency p75 |        34.855941 ms |                14.951189 ms |          52.644787 ms |
|                           Latency p90 |        54.613394 ms |                28.497256 ms |         118.340402 ms |
|                           Latency p95 |        59.785127 ms |                72.671788 ms |         229.129526 ms |
|                           Latency p99 |        74.139638 ms |               273.218523 ms |        1495.660763 ms |
|                         Latency p99.9 |        97.385495 ms |              2526.873285 ms |        3499.225138 ms |
|      SERVER-TOTAL-NETWORK-RX-DATA-SUM |              5.1 GB |                      4.6 GB |                5.6 GB |
|      SERVER-TOTAL-NETWORK-TX-DATA-SUM |              3.8 GB |                      3.6 GB |                4.4 GB |
|           CLIENT-TOTAL-NETWORK-RX-SUM |              252 MB |                      357 MB |                206 MB |
|           CLIENT-TOTAL-NETWORK-TX-SUM |              1.5 GB |                      1.4 GB |                1.5 GB |
|                  SERVER-MAX-CPU-USAGE |            446.83 % |                   1122.00 % |              426.33 % |
|               SERVER-MAX-MEMORY-USAGE |              1.1 GB |                       15 GB |                4.6 GB |
|                  CLIENT-MAX-CPU-USAGE |            606.00 % |                    314.00 % |              215.00 % |
|               CLIENT-MAX-MEMORY-USAGE |               96 MB |                      2.4 GB |                 86 MB |
|                    CLIENT-ERROR-COUNT |                   0 |                       2,652 |                     0 |
|  SERVER-AVG-READS-COMPLETED-DELTA-SUM |                   0 |                         237 |                     2 |
|    SERVER-AVG-SECTORS-READS-DELTA-SUM |                   0 |                           0 |                     0 |
| SERVER-AVG-WRITES-COMPLETED-DELTA-SUM |             108,067 |                     157,034 |               675,072 |
|  SERVER-AVG-SECTORS-WRITTEN-DELTA-SUM |          20,449,360 |                  16,480,488 |           106,836,768 |
|           SERVER-AVG-DISK-SPACE-USAGE |              2.6 GB |                      6.9 GB |                2.9 GB |
+---------------------------------------+---------------------+-----------------------------+-----------------------+


zookeeper__r3_5_3_beta errors:
"zk: connection closed" (count 2,264)
"zk: could not connect to a server" (count 388)

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-LATENCY-MS

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-LATENCY-MS-BY-KEY

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-LATENCY-MS-BY-KEY-ERROR-POINTS

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-THROUGHPUT

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-VOLUNTARY-CTXT-SWITCHES

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-NON-VOLUNTARY-CTXT-SWITCHES

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-CPU

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/MAX-CPU

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-VMRSS-MB

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-VMRSS-MB-BY-KEY

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-VMRSS-MB-BY-KEY-ERROR-POINTS

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-READS-COMPLETED-DELTA

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-SECTORS-READ-DELTA

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-WRITES-COMPLETED-DELTA

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-SECTORS-WRITTEN-DELTA

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-READ-BYTES-NUM-DELTA

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-WRITE-BYTES-NUM-DELTA

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-RECEIVE-BYTES-NUM-DELTA

2018Q1-02-etcd-zookeeper-consul/write-1M-keys-best-throughput/AVG-TRANSMIT-BYTES-NUM-DELTA