Dhara: NAND flash translation layer for small MCUs
Daniel Beer <[email protected]>
1 Apr 2017
Dhara is a small flash translation layer designed to be used in
resource-constrained systems for managing NAND flash. It provides a
mutable block interface with standard read and write operations. It has
the following additional features:
* Perfect wear-levelling: the erase count of any two blocks will
differ by at most 1.
* Trim: logical sectors can be deleted to improve performance if their
content is not required.
* Data integrity: write() (and trim()) of logical sectors are
atomic. If the power fails, the state rolls back to the last
synchronization point. Synchronization points occur at regular
intervals, but can also be reached on demand.
* Real-time performance: all operations, including startup, are O(log
n) worst case in the size of the chip, if bad blocks are uniformly
distributed.
The implementation makes minimal assumptions regarding the underlying
NAND chip. It can be used with almost any chip available, and can take
advantage of extra hardware features where available. In particular:
* No OOB data is consumed. All available OOB bytes can be spent on
ECC.
* It can take advantage of internally buffered copy operations, if the
NAND chip supports these.
* It can make use of NAND chip's on-board ECC, if available. If
software ECC is required, implementations of Hamming and BCH codes
are provided in the source distribution (see the ecc/ directory).
* It does not require partial page programmability. However, if the
functionality is present, then it can be taken advantage of by
presenting a smaller pseudo-page size by dividing the real page size
by the number of allowed reprogram operations. The only restriction
is that partial writes must contain complete ECC information.
* It will take advantage of the ability to do partial reads if this is
possible. Reads must be error checked and corrected (this can
usually be done in units smaller than the page size).
The implementation consists of the files in the dhara/ subdirectory,
plus the NAND layer implementation, which you must provide. The
top-level interface is the set of functions described in map.h (see the
comments in the header file for more details):
init: initialize a map layer instance
resume: scan the map and recover the saved state
clear: delete all data
capacity, size: obtain usage statistics
find: obtain the physical location of a logical sector
read: read a logical sector
write: write a logical sector
copy_page: copy a raw flash page to a logical sector
copy_sector: copy one logical sector to another
trim: remove a logical sector from the map
sync: ensure that changes to the map are committed
gc: manually trigger garbage collection
To provide the NAND layer, implement the set of functions described in
nand.h (see comments for details). In summary, you must provide the
following operations:
is_bad: determine whether a block is bad
mark_bad: mark a NAND block as bad
erase: erase a NAND block
prog: program a NAND page, including ECC and checksums
is_free: determine whether a page is erased (unprogrammed)
read: read a (possibly partial) NAND page, and attempt ECC if
necessary
copy: copy one page to another, using internal buffers if possible
Check the datasheet for your chip for information on these operations.
In most cases, the manufacturer will specify a preferred layout scheme
for the ECC and bad block markers in the OOB region. Pay particular
attention to the marker used for factory-marked bad blocks!
If your ECC scheme is such that programming an all-0xff page is
equivalent to a no-op, then it's ok for your implementation of is_free()
to simply check for all-0xff page content.
Note that bad blocks need only be queried one at a time. It's not
necessary to maintain a bad-block table -- just the standard OOB marking
scheme is fine, and preserves the performance guarantees of the map
layer.
Also note that when implementing partial read, you must read enough of
the page that you're able to apply ECC and check for uncorrectable
errors. Uncorrectable errors *must* be detected in order for the data
integrity guarantees to be valid. This may require the use of a checksum
in addition to ECC. If this is done, ensure that the checksum bytes are
also protected by ECC!
Implementations of two popular ECC mechanisms (Hamming and BCH) can be
found in the ecc/ subdirectory. Each implements ECC over variable-sized
chunks (256 or 512 bytes are typical sizes). Multiple ECC chunks may be
required per page.
