TedEval: A Fair Evaluation Metric for Scene Text Detectors
Official Python 3 implementation of TedEval | paper | slides
Chae Young Lee, Youngmin Baek, and Hwalsuk Lee.
Clova AI Research, NAVER Corp.
Overview
We propose a new evaluation metric for scene text detectors called TedEval. Through separate instance-level matching policy and character-level scoring policy, TedEval solves the drawbacks of previous metrics such as IoU and DetEval. This code is based on ICDAR15 official evaluation code.
Methodology
1. Mathcing Policy
- Non-exclusively gathers all possible matches of not only one-to-one but also one-to-many and many-to-one.
- The threshold of both area recall and area precision are set to 0.4.
- Multiline is identified and rejected when |min(theta, 180 - theta)| > 45 from Fig. 2.
2. Scoring Policy
We compute Pseudo Character Center (PCC) from word-level bounding boxes and penalize matches when PCCs are missing or overlapping.
Sample Evaluation
Experiments
We evaluated state-of-the-art scene text detectors with TedEval on two benchmark datasets: ICDAR 2013 Focused Scene Text (IC13) and ICDAR 2015 Incidental Scene Text (IC15). Detectors are listed in the order of published dates.
ICDAR 2013
Detector | Date (YY/MM/DD) | Recall (%) | Precision (%) | H-mean (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CTPN | 16/09/12 | 82.1 | 92.7 | 87.6 |
RRPN | 17/03/03 | 89.0 | 94.2 | 91.6 |
SegLink | 17/03/19 | 65.6 | 74.9 | 70.0 |
EAST | 17/04/11 | 77.7 | 87.1 | 82.5 |
WordSup | 17/08/22 | 87.5 | 92.2 | 90.2 |
PixelLink | 18/01/04 | 84.0 | 87.2 | 86.1 |
FOTS | 18/01/05 | 91.5 | 93.0 | 92.6 |
TextBoxes++ | 18/01/09 | 87.4 | 92.3 | 90.0 |
MaskTextSpotter | 18/07/06 | 90.2 | 95.4 | 92.9 |
PMTD | 19/03/28 | 94.0 | 95.2 | 94.7 |
CRAFT | 19/04/03 | 93.6 | 96.5 | 95.1 |
ICDAR 2015
Detector | Date (YY/MM/DD) | Recall (%) | Precision (%) | H-mean (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CTPN | 16/09/12 | 85.0 | 81.1 | 67.8 |
RRPN | 17/03/03 | 79.5 | 85.9 | 82.6 |
SegLink | 17/03/19 | 77.1 | 83.9 | 80.6 |
EAST | 17/04/11 | 82.5 | 90.0 | 86.3 |
WordSup | 17/08/22 | 83.2 | 87.1 | 85.2 |
PixelLink | 18/01/04 | 85.7 | 86.1 | 86.0 |
FOTS | 18/01/05 | 89.0 | 93.4 | 91.2 |
TextBoxes++ | 18/01/09 | 82.4 | 90.8 | 86.5 |
MaskTextSpotter | 18/07/06 | 82.5 | 91.8 | 86.9 |
PMTD | 19/03/28 | 89.2 | 92.8 | 91.0 |
CRAFT | 19/04/03 | 88.5 | 93.1 | 90.9 |
Frequency
Getting Started
Clone repository
git clone https://github.com/clovaai/TedEval.git
Requirements
- python 3
- python 3.x Polygon, Bottle, Pillow
# install
pip3 install Polygon3 bottle Pillow
Supported Annotation Type
- LTRB (xmin, ymin, xmax, ymax)
- QUAD (x1, y1, x2, y2, x3, y3, x4, y4)
Evaluation
Prepare data
The ground truth and the result data should be text files, one for each sample. Note that the default naming rule of each text file is that there must be img_{number}
in the filename and that the number indicate the image sample (this can be changed in default_evaluation_params()
in script.py
).
# gt/gt_img_38.txt
644,101,932,113,932,168,643,156,concierge@L3
477,138,487,139,488,149,477,148,###
344,131,398,130,398,149,344,149,###
1195,148,1277,138,1277,177,1194,187,###
23,270,128,267,128,282,23,284,###
# result/res_img_38.txt
644,101,932,113,932,168,643,156,{Transcription},{Confidence}
477,138,487,139,488,149,477,148
344,131,398,130,398,149,344,149
1195,148,1277,138,1277,177,1194,187
23,270,128,267,128,282,23,284
Compress these text files without the parent directory.
zip gt.zip gt/*
zip result.zip result/*
Refer to gt/result.zip
and gt/gt_*.zip
for examples.
Run stand-alone evaluation
python script.py –g=gt/gt.zip –s=result/result.zip
For evaluation setup, please refer to the following parameter list to edit default_evaluation_params()
in script.py
.
Important Parameters
name | type | default | description |
---|---|---|---|
AREA_RECALL_CONSTRAINT | float |
0.4 |
area recall constraint (0 <= R <= 1) |
AREA_PRECISION_CONSTRAINT | float |
0.4 |
area precision constraint (0 <= P <= 1) |
GT_LTRB | boolean |
False |
GT file annotation type (True if LTRB, False if QUAD) |
DET_LTRB | boolean |
False |
prediction file annotation type (True if LTRB, False if QUAD) |
TRANSCRIPTION | boolean |
False |
set True if result file has transcription |
CONFIDENCES | boolean |
False |
set True if result file has confidence |
Run Visualizer
python web.py
- Place the zip file of images and GTs of the dataset named
images.zip
andgt.zip
, respectively, in thegt
directory. - Create an empty directory name
output
. This is where the DB, submission files, and result files will be created. - You can change the host and port number in the final line of
web.py
.
The file structure should then be:
.
├── gt
│ ├── gt.zip
│ └── images.zip
├── output # empty dir
├── script.py
├── web.py
├── README.md
└── ...
Citation
@article{lee2019tedeval,
title={TedEval: A Fair Evaluation Metric for Scene Text Detectors},
author={Lee, Chae Young and Baek, Youngmin and Lee, Hwalsuk},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.01227},
year={2019}
}
Contact us
We welcome any feedbacks to our metric. Please contact the authors via {cylee7133, youngmin.baek, hwalsuk.lee}@gmail.com
. In case of code errors, open an issue and we will get to you.
License
Copyright (c) 2019-present NAVER Corp.
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE.