Review pull-requests on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs. nixpkgs-review automatically builds packages changed in the pull requests.
- ofborg support: reuses evaluation output of CI to skip local evaluation, but also falls back if ofborg is not finished
- provides a
nix-shell
with all packages that did not fail to build - remote builder support
- allows to build a subset of packages (great for mass-rebuilds)
- allow to build nixos tests
- markdown reports
- GitHub integration:
- post PR comments with results
- approve or merge PRs (the last one requires maintainer permission)
- show PR comments/reviews
- logs per built or failed package
- symlinks built packages to result directory for inspection
nixpkgs-review
is included in nixpkgs.
To use it without installing it, use:
$ nix run 'nixpkgs#nixpkgs-review'
To run it from the git repository:
$ nix-build
$ ./result/bin/nixpkgs-review
For IDEs:
$ nix-build -A env -o .venv
or just use:
./bin/nixpkgs-review
First, change to your local nixpkgs repository directory, i.e.:
cd ~/git/nixpkgs
Note that your local checkout git will not be affected by nixpkgs-review
,
since it will use git-worktree to
perform fast checkouts.
Then run nixpkgs-review
by providing the pull request number…
$ nixpkgs-review pr 37242
…or the full pull request URL:
$ nixpkgs-review pr https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/37242
The output will then look as follows:
$ git fetch --force https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs pull/37242/head:refs/nixpkgs-review/0
$ git worktree add /home/joerg/git/nixpkgs/.review/pr-37242 1cb9f643480612696de93fb2f2a2f3340d0e3156
Preparing /home/joerg/git/nixpkgs/.review/pr-37242 (identifier pr-37242)
Checking out files: 100% (14825/14825), done.
HEAD is now at 1cb9f643480 redis: 4.0.7 -> 4.0.8
Building in /tmp/nox-review-4ml2epyy: redis
$ nix-build --no-out-link --keep-going --max-jobs 4 --option build-use-sandbox true <nixpkgs> -A redis
/nix/store/jbp7m1gshmk8an8sb14glwijgw1chvvq-redis-4.0.8
$ nix-shell -p redis
[nix-shell:~/git/nixpkgs]$ /nix/store/jbp7m1gshmk8an8sb14glwijgw1chvvq-redis-4.0.8/bin/redis-cli --version
redis-cli 4.0.8
To review a local commit without pull request, use the following command:
$ nixpkgs-review rev HEAD
Instead of HEAD
a commit or branch can also be given.
To review uncommitted changes, use the following command:
$ nixpkgs-review wip
Staged changes can be reviewed like this:
$ nixpkgs-review wip --staged
If you'd like to post the nixpkgs-review
results as a formatted PR comment,
pass the --post-result
flag:
$ nixpkgs-review pr --post-result 37242
Instead of posting a PR comment, nixpkgs-review can also print the report to the
terminal using the --print-result
flag. This flag will work for the rev
and
wip
command..
$ nixpkgs-review pr --print-result 37242
Often, after reviewing a diff on a pull request, you may want to say "This diff looks good to me, approve/merge it provided that there are no package build failures". To do so, run the following subcommands from within the nix-shell provided by nixpkgs-review.
$ nixpkgs-review pr 37242
nix-shell> nixpkgs-review approve
# Or, if you have maintainer access and would like to merge (provided no build failures):
nix-shell> nixpkgs-review merge
# It is also possible to upload the result report from here
nix-shell> nixpkgs-review post-result
# Review-comments can also be shown
nix-shell> nixpkgs-review comments
nixpkgs-review
will by default use
nix-output-monitor if found in
$PATH
. If you have nom
installed but don't want to use it, you can pass
nix
to --build-graph
to use nix build
instead of nom build
.
Some pull requests may require configuration for nixpkgs to test out. You can
use the --extra-nixpkgs-config
flag to supply extra configuration for nixpkgs.
$ nixpkgs-review pr 37242 --extra-nixpkgs-config '{ cudaSupport = true; }'
After building, nixpkgs-review
will normally start a nix-shell
with the
packages built, to allow for interactive testing. To use nixpkgs-review
non-interactively in scripts, use the --no-shell
command, which can allow for
batch processing of multiple reviews or use in scripts/bots.
Example testing multiple unrelated PRs and posting the build results as PR comments for later review:
for pr in 807{60..70}; do
nixpkgs-review pr --no-shell --post-result $pr && echo "PR $pr succeeded" || echo "PR $pr failed"
done
nixpkgs-review
also accepts a --run
flag that allows to run a custom command
inside the nix-shell instead of an interactive session:
$ nixpkgs-review pr --run 'jq < report.json' 113814
# ...
{
"blacklisted": [],
"broken": [],
"built": [
"cargo-deny"
],
"failed": [],
"non-existent": [],
"pr": 113814,
"system": "x86_64-linux",
"tests": []
}
nixpkgs-review accept multiple pull request numbers at once:
$ nixpkgs-review pr 94524 94494 94522 94493 94520
This will first evaluate & build all pull requests in serial. Then a nix-shell will be opened for each of them after the previous shell has been closed.
Tip: Since it's hard to keep track of the numbers, for each opened shell the corresponding pull request URL is shown.
Nixpkgs-review will pass all arguments given in --build-arg
to nix-build
:
$ nixpkgs-review pr --build-args="--builders 'ssh://[email protected]'" 37244
As an alternative, one can also specify remote builder as usual in
/etc/nix/machines
or via the nix.buildMachines
nixos options in
configuration.nix
. This allows to parallelize builds across multiple machines.
Some commands (i.e., post-result
or merge
) require a GitHub API token, and
even for read-only calls, GitHub returns 403 error messages if your IP hits the
rate limit for unauthenticated calls.
To use a token, first create a
personal access token.
If you plan to post comments with the reports generated, you need to add the
repo:public_repo
scope.
Then use either the GITHUB_TOKEN
environment variable or the --token
parameter of the pr
subcommand.
$ GITHUB_TOKEN=5ae04810f1e9f17c3297ee4c9e25f3ac1f437c26 nixpkgs-review pr 37244
Additionally, nixpkgs-review will also read the oauth_token stored by hub and gh.
By default, nixpkgs-review pr
will merge the pull request into the pull
request's target branch (most commonly master). However, at times
mass-rebuilding commits have been applied in the target branch, but not yet
built by hydra. Often those are not relevant for the current review, but will
significantly increase the local build time. For this case, the --checkout
option can be specified to override the default behavior (merge
). By setting
its value to commit
, nixpkgs-review
will checkout the user's pull request
branch without merging it:
$ nixpkgs-review pr --checkout commit 44534
To build only certain packages, use the --package
(or -p
) flag.
$ nixpkgs-review pr -p openjpeg -p ImageMagick 49262
There is also the --package-regex
option that takes a regular expression to
match against the attribute name.
# build only linux kernels but not the packages
$ nixpkgs-review pr --package-regex 'linux_' 51292
To skip building certain packages, use the --skip-package
(or -P
) flag.
$ nixpkgs-review pr -P ImageMagick 49262
There is also the --skip-package-regex
option that takes a regular expression
to match against the attribute name. Unlike the --package-regex
option, a full
match is required, which means you probably want to work with .*
or \w+
.
# skip building linux kernels but not the packages
$ nixpkgs-review pr --skip-package-regex 'linux_.*' 51292
-p
, -P
, --package-regex
and --skip-package-regex
can be used together,
in which case the matching packages will be merged.
Full documentation for regex matching syntax can be found here.
NixOS tests can be run by using the --package
feature and our nixosTests
attribute set:
$ nixpkgs-review pr -p nixosTests.ferm 47077
By default, nixpkgs-review will use ofborg's evaluation result if available to
figure out what packages need to be rebuilt. This can be turned off using
--eval local
, which is useful if ofborg's evaluation result is outdated. Even
if using --eval ofborg
, nixpkgs-review will fall back to local evaluation if
ofborg's result is not (yet) available.
Both the rev
and the wip
subcommand support a --remote
argument to
overwrite the upstream repository URL (defaults to
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
). The following example will use
mayflower
's nixpkgs fork to fetch the branch where the changes will be merged
into:
$ nixpkgs-review --remote https://github.com/mayflower/nixpkgs wip
Note that this has been not yet implemented for pull requests, i.e., pr
subcommand.
The --system
flag allows setting a system different from the current one. Note
that the result nix-shell may not be able to execute all hooks correctly since
the architecture/operating system mismatches.
$ nixpkgs-review pr --system aarch64-linux 98734
The --sandbox
flag setups a sandbox using
bubblewrap. This is the same tool
used by Flatpak and OSTree, and offers an unprivileged sandbox based on user
namespaces.
Keep in mind that --sandbox
flag is not necessary tuned for privacy or
security. Instead, it uses a pretty lax sandbox where it is possible to leak
data sensitive by environment variables or stateful filesystems (like /run
).
The reason for this is because many packages would break otherwise, and this
would make this flag useless for review purposes.
The objective of --sandbox
is to protect your system against accidental
modification and to offer a clean(ish) system state where packages can be
tested. For example, it mounts a tmpfs
in-place of your HOME
directory,
avoiding situations where a dirty configuration on your HOME
directory can
lead to a broken package during testing. It also protects your HOME
and system
against undesired files created during package testing.
This flag is still in an experimental stage. Please note that it isn't exhaustive tested against nixpkgs, so some packages may break under it. Before disapproving a PR because the program is broken under the sandbox, try without this flag first to make sure that the issue is not the sandbox. If the issue is caused because of the sandbox, please open an issue including the PR number in nixpkgs so we can try to fix this issue.
$ nix-shell -p bubblewrap # or install it using NixOS/Home-Manager/etc.
$ nixpkgs-review --sandbox pr 98734
- build on multiple platforms
- test backports
- show pull request description + diff during review
To run tests use:
$ pytest
We also use python3's type hints. To check them, use mypy
:
$ mypy nixpkgs_review
- nox-review:
- works but is as slow as a snail: the checkout process of nox-review is slow since it requires multiple git fetches. Also it cannot make use of ofborg's evaluation
- it only builds all packages without providing a
nix-shell
for review
- niff:
- only provides a list of packages that have changed, but does not build packages
- also needs to evaluate changed attributes locally instead of using ofborg